Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB627

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/25
• Refer: 11/7/25
• Report Pass: 1/22/26
• Refer: 1/22/26
• Refer: 2/13/26
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to repeal 95.68 (4) (b) 2., 95.69 (4) (b) 2. and 95.71 (5) (c) 2.; to renumber 95.68 (7) and 95.69 (7); to renumber and amend 95.68 (4) (a); to amend 95.68 (4) (b) 1., 95.68 (8), 95.69 (4) (a), 95.69 (4) (b) 1., 95.69 (8), 95.71 (5) (a), 95.71 (5) (b), 95.71 (5) (c) 1. and 95.71 (8); to create 95.68 (1) (aj), 95.68 (1) (ak), 95.68 (1) (aL), 95.68 (4) (a) 1., 95.68 (4) (a) 2., 95.68 (4) (a) 3., 95.68 (7) (b), 95.69 (5) (a) 3., 95.69 (5) (a) 4., 95.69 (5) (a) 5. and 95.69 (7) (b) of the statutes; Relating to: fees related to animal markets, animal dealers, animal truckers, and animal transport vehicles. (FE)

Impact

The introduction of AB627 is expected to alter existing regulations by specifying fee structures that animal dealers and transporters must adhere to. This legislative measure could potentially streamline operations in the animal transport sector, making it easier for businesses to navigate compliance. Local authorities may have enhanced oversight capabilities to ensure adherence to these regulations, which could lead to improved animal welfare provisions. Conversely, the financial implications for existing operators will need to be carefully considered, especially smaller businesses that may be adversely affected by increased fees.

Summary

AB627 addresses regulatory fees pertaining to animal markets, dealers, truckers, and transport vehicles. The bill aims to establish clear guidelines and oversight regarding these fees, which are essential for maintaining standards in the commerce of animals. Supporters of AB627 argue that the regulation of fees will enhance transparency in the animal market trade and ensure that all parties involved comply with necessary health and safety standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB627 stem from the implementation of fees. Some stakeholders express concern that new or increased fees may create financial burdens for smaller operators in the animal transport business. Additionally, there are discussions surrounding how these regulatory measures will be enforced, and fears that excessive regulation could stifle competition in local markets. The bill emphasizes a balance between necessary regulation for safety and health versus the economic viability of local animal businesses.