Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB619

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/25
• Refer: 11/7/25
• Report Pass: 2/11/26
• Refer: 2/11/26
• Refer: 2/13/26
• Engrossed: 2/17/26
• Refer: 2/20/26
• Refer: 2/27/26
• Enrolled: 3/24/26
• Chaptered: 4/2/26
• Passed: 4/2/26

Caption

An Act to amend 20.866 (1) (u), 25.29 (1) (a), 71.05 (6) (a) 15., 71.21 (4) (a), 71.26 (2) (a) 4., 71.34 (1k) (g) and 71.45 (2) (a) 10.; to create 20.370 (7) (cj), 20.866 (2) (tj), 23.44, 71.07 (3v), 71.10 (4) (em), 71.28 (3v), 71.30 (3) (am), 71.47 (3v), 71.49 (1) (am) and 238.394 of the statutes; Relating to: a tax credit for aviation biofuel manufacturing, authorizing the state to contract public debt for an aviation biofuel project grant, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The bill specifically impacts statutes related to tax credits for manufacturing businesses. By allowing a single certified aviation biofuel business to claim substantial tax benefits, capped at $120 million, the measure is expected to enhance investment in this sector. The establishment of a 20-year operational period for designated aviation biofuel businesses represents a substantial commitment from the state to support and stabilize this nascent industry, potentially leading to increased job creation and technological innovation in the field.

Summary

Assembly Bill 619, also known as the Aviation Biofuel Tax Credit Act, establishes a tax credit framework for businesses engaged in the manufacturing of aviation biofuels. The bill aims to promote sustainable energy sources by incentivizing the production of biofuels that are primarily sourced from within the state. This initiative is part of broader efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and stimulate the local economy through green technology.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding AB 619 generally reflect a positive sentiment towards the goals of promoting sustainable energy and supporting local industries. Advocates argue that this legislation addresses critical energy issues while fostering economic growth and environmental sustainability. However, some skepticism remains regarding the long-term effectiveness of tax incentives in achieving desired outcomes, particularly concerning ecological impact and economic viability.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions around AB 619 pertains to the allocation of resources and the effectiveness of tax credits as a means of stimulating the aviation biofuel industry. Critics question whether directing state resources towards a single business may limit competition and innovation within the industry. Proponents counter that a focused investment can provide the necessary stability for the business to thrive and ultimately lead to broader market benefits.