Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB52

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to repeal 71.54 (1) (g) 5. and 71.54 (1) (g) 7.; to amend 71.54 (1) (g) (intro.), 71.54 (1) (g) 4., 71.54 (1) (g) 6. (intro.), 71.54 (2) (b) 4. and 71.54 (2m); to create 71.54 (1) (h) and 71.54 (2) (b) 5. of the statutes; Relating to: expanding the homestead income tax credit. (FE)

Impact

This legislation has significant implications for state tax policy and could potentially improve the financial situation of many low-income families by allowing them increased access to tax refunds. The changes introduced by AB52 would begin to take effect for claims filed in the 2025 tax year, meaning actionable changes for residents could be observed fairly quickly. Furthermore, the bill includes a provision for indexing these amounts for inflation in future tax years, ensuring that the benefits of the credit adapt to increased living costs over time. This adaptive measure is crucial for maintaining the relevance and accessibility of the credit for future beneficiaries.

Summary

Assembly Bill 52 aims to expand the homestead income tax credit provided to homeowners and renters in Wisconsin. This bill proposes to adjust several key components of the existing tax credit, increasing both the income eligibility cap and modifying the percentage formula used to calculate the credit. Under the current law, the homestead tax credit is designed for low-to-middle income households, but the bill will increase the maximum household income from $24,680 to $35,000, thus allowing more residents to benefit from this tax relief mechanism. Moreover, the percentage used to reduce the property taxes or rent based on household income will be adjusted from 8.785% to 5.614%, effectively increasing the credit amount for eligible claimants.

Contention

While the overarching goal of AB52 is to provide greater tax relief, there remain concerns regarding fiscal impacts. Critics argue that expanding the homestead credit could strain state revenue, posing challenges if not appropriately accounted for in the overall budget. There are deliberations about whether recent legislative adjustments will adequately address the needs of all constituents or if it disproportionately favors certain demographic groups. Supporters, on the other hand, deem this bill as necessary to help lower-income households maintain their residences and lessen the impact of property tax burdens, particularly in times of rising housing costs.