Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB162

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/25
• Refer: 4/8/25
• Report Pass: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Engrossed: 4/22/25
• Refer: 4/24/25
• Enrolled: 10/17/25
• Vetoed: 10/31/25

Caption

An Act to renumber and amend 106.11; to amend 106.11 (title) and 109.07 (1m) (a); to create 106.11 (1) (title) and (2) of the statutes; Relating to: workforce metrics. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, AB162 will create a structured framework for evaluating workforce programs by mandating the collection of data pertaining to employment outcomes for participants. Specifically, agencies will be required to report metrics such as the percentages of participants achieving gainful employment post-program and obtaining recognized educational credentials. This initiative is expected to improve transparency and accountability in workforce investments, aligning state funding with demonstrable results in employment and training sectors, thereby impacting state laws concerning labor force development significantly.

Summary

Assembly Bill 162, titled 'Workforce Metrics', aims to enhance the efficacy of workforce development programs in Wisconsin by requiring state agencies to track and report on various performance indicators. The bill amends existing statutes to create a comprehensive workforce investment system, ensuring that programs funded through state or federal resources provide measurable benefits to participants. It emphasizes the need for job training, career planning, and placement services to be accessible and effective in meeting the needs of individuals seeking wage-earning employment within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards AB162 has been mostly positive among proponents who view it as a vital step towards strengthening the workforce in Wisconsin. Supporters appreciate the bill's focus on accountability and performance tracking, which they believe will lead to more effective workforce programs. However, some stakeholders express concerns about the feasibility of tracking such metrics and the potential administrative burden it may impose on smaller agencies and local workforce boards. This has led to discussions regarding the balance between improving accountability and ensuring that local entities can manage their resources effectively.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention surrounding AB162 include debates over the adequacy of its funding mechanisms and the implications for local workforce boards. While proponents believe that clearer performance metrics will lead to improved outcomes, critics argue that the bill could impose additional reporting requirements that may strain local resources. Additionally, there are concerns about how effectively the metrics can capture the diverse needs of the workforce across different regions, which might not be adequately represented by standard indicators.