Wisconsin Senate Bill SB419

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/8/23
• Refer: 9/8/23
• Report Pass: 10/6/23
• Engrossed: 10/17/23
• Refer: 10/19/23
• Enrolled: 11/16/23
• Chaptered: 12/7/23
• Passed: 12/7/23

Caption

Practice of fitting and dealing in hearing aids, certification of hearing instrument specialists to engage in cerumen management, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

This legislation is set to change state law by formalizing the process through which hearing instrument specialists can receive training and certification in cerumen management. The Hearing and Speech Examining Board will be directed to identify and approve courses that provide a minimum of six hours of instruction, which will include safe techniques for cerumen removal and a final examination. This addition ensures that specialists possess the requisite knowledge and skills to carry out these procedures safely and effectively, potentially leading to better ear health outcomes for patients.

Summary

Senate Bill 419 addresses the practice of fitting and dealing in hearing aids and establishes a certification process for hearing instrument specialists to engage in cerumen management. The bill refines the existing definition of fitting and dealing in hearing aids to specifically cover the selection, adaptation, and sale of prescription hearing aids. It stipulates that hearing instrument specialists, previously prohibited from performing cerumen management, can now obtain certification to undertake this procedure, thereby expanding their capabilities in ear care.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for promoting the professional development of hearing instrument specialists, there are concerns regarding the implications of increased responsibilities without strict oversight. Opponents may argue that expanding the role of hearing instrument specialists could lead to health risks if not properly managed. Additionally, the issue of whether cerumen management should remain strictly within the purview of audiologists might be a point of contention during discussions around implementation and regulation.