Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Washington Senate Bill SB5351

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
2/21/25  
Engrossed
3/10/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Report Pass
4/5/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Enrolled
4/22/25  
Chaptered
5/12/25  

Caption

AN ACT Relating to ensuring patient choice and access to care by prohibiting unfair and deceptive dental insurance practices;

Summary

SB 5351 is a Washington insurance bill focused on dental-only plans and dental insurance payment practices. It prohibits dental-only plans from denying coverage solely because a procedure was performed on the same day, while preserving the ability to deny claims for reasons such as fraud, waste, abuse, unbundling, clinical appropriateness, and medical necessity. The bill also addresses reimbursement when dental providers are paid by credit card, requiring carriers or limited health care service contractors to give advance notice of any card-processing fees, offer a fee-free alternative payment method, and provide clear instructions for selecting that option. The bill further directs the Office of the Insurance Commissioner to contract with the William D. Ruckelshaus Center to convene stakeholders and study issues in dental insurance, including loss ratios and provider payment differences tied to network status. It also expands annual reporting requirements for carriers offering dental-only plans, including data on membership, revenue, payments, loss ratios, and premium trends, and makes that information publicly searchable. The commissioner is authorized to adopt rules to implement the act, and the bill includes an emergency clause for immediate effect, though one section was vetoed by the governor. In practical terms, the bill amends Washington insurance law in chapters governing health carriers and related reporting requirements, and it creates new statutory duties for dental-only plans, the insurance commissioner, and the Ruckelshaus Center. It affects dental insurers, limited health care service contractors, dental providers, and consumers by limiting certain claim denials, changing payment practices, and increasing transparency around dental plan performance and pricing. The overall sentiment around the bill appears strongly supportive and bipartisan. It passed the Senate and House with unanimous or near-unanimous votes at each recorded stage, including committee approvals and final passage in both chambers. The governor approved the bill with a partial veto, indicating general agreement with the policy while objecting to one emergency-related section. The main point of contention was not the core dental insurance reforms, but the emergency clause section that would have made part of the act effective immediately. In the governor’s veto message, the administration said the Office of the Insurance Commissioner was already working to implement the stakeholder contract by the bill’s effective date, so an emergency clause was unnecessary for that section. No other major opposition is reflected in the available voting record or transcripts.

Impact

SB 5351 amends Washington insurance statutes governing dental-only plans and related reporting by carriers, limited health care service contractors, and disability insurers offering dental coverage. It creates new restrictions on claim denials, new requirements for provider payment methods and fee disclosures, expanded annual data reporting to the Insurance Commissioner, public posting of carrier data, and a stakeholder study process through the Ruckelshaus Center. The bill also authorizes rulemaking by the commissioner and includes an emergency clause, though one section was vetoed.

Sentiment

The bill received overwhelmingly favorable treatment throughout the legislative process, with unanimous committee votes and unanimous or near-unanimous floor passage in both chambers. The lack of recorded opposition suggests broad support for the consumer-protection and transparency goals of the measure. The governor’s partial veto indicates support for the bill’s substance overall, with only a narrow objection to the emergency timing provision.

Contention

The only clearly identified disagreement concerned Section 7, the emergency clause. The governor vetoed that section on the ground that immediate effectiveness was unnecessary because implementation work was already underway. No significant contention appears in the votes or available discussion over the bill’s core provisions on same-day procedure denials, credit-card payment fees, or expanded reporting.

Companion Bills

WA HB1535

Crossfiled AN ACT Relating to ensuring patient choice and access to care by prohibiting unfair and deceptive dental insurance practices;

Previously Filed As

WA HB1535

Ensuring patient choice and access to care by prohibiting unfair and deceptive dental insurance practices.

WA LB1118

Classify certain actions by a social media platform as deceptive trade practices under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act

WA HB1680

Improving access to patient care by increasing preventive dental care.

WA LB326

Change provisions relating to the Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Act, the Nebraska Property and Liability Insurance Guaranty Association Act, and mutual insurance holding companies and eliminate the provisions of the Health Insurance Access Act and the Health Care Purchasing Pool Act

WA HB2614

Relating To Deceptive Practices.

WA LB385

Change provisions relating to the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act

WA HB2261

Ensuring transparency in credentials and communications between patients and health care professionals.

WA SB6166

Ensuring transparency in credentials and communications between patients and health care professionals.

WA H1005

Deceptive and Unfair Trade Acts or Practices

WA HB1005

Deceptive and Unfair Trade Acts or Practices:

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.