AN ACT Relating to advanced placement, international baccalaureate, and Cambridge international exams;
Summary
HB 1612 requires the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to subsidize student fees for exam registration and administration for students taking Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), and Cambridge International exams. The bill also directs that state funds used for this purpose may not be used to replace federal or private funds that already subsidize those exam fees, preserving those other funding sources rather than allowing the state appropriation to supplant them.
In addition to the fee subsidy, the bill expands reporting requirements for the education data center. Working with several education and workforce agencies, the center must produce an annual dual credit report for the Legislature that includes participation, credit-award, and academic-performance data for dual credit programs, along with disaggregated data by gender, dependent status, homelessness, and multilingual learner status. The report must also recommend additional categories for data collection and consider whether to require reporting on how postsecondary credits earned through dual credit apply toward credentials and degrees, and whether outcomes differ between students who do and do not participate in dual credit programs.
Impact
The bill would amend chapter 28A RCW by creating a new state obligation to subsidize AP, IB, and Cambridge exam fees and by adding new legislative reporting requirements related to dual credit and student outcomes. It affects the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the education data center, and multiple education agencies and institutions that contribute to the annual report. It also establishes a non-supplanting rule for state funds, limiting how appropriated money may be used alongside federal and private subsidies.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee testimony or votes in the provided materials, the measure appears to be framed as a student-support and access bill rather than a controversial policy change. Its focus on reducing exam costs and improving data collection suggests generally favorable intent toward expanding opportunity and transparency in advanced coursework and dual credit pathways. No formal vote history or public testimony is provided here to indicate opposition or support levels.
Contention
The main policy issues likely concern fiscal responsibility and the scope of state involvement. The subsidy requirement creates an ongoing state expenditure, and the bill explicitly bars the use of state funds to replace federal or private support, which may be intended to address concerns about funding overlap. The reporting provisions may also draw scrutiny because they expand data collection and require agencies to analyze student outcomes across multiple demographic categories and program types, raising questions about administrative burden, privacy, and the usefulness of additional reporting.
Provide for licensure of internationally trained physicians under the Uniform Credentialing Act and change provisions of the Engineers and Architects Regulation Act