Vermont House Bill HCR178

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/26
• Engrossed: 1/30/26
• Passed: 1/30/26

Caption

House concurrent resolution in memory of former Senator William H. Carris of Wells

Impact

This resolution impacts state laws by acknowledging the contributions of a significant public figure and serves to commemorate the values of community service and leadership. It expresses the General Assembly's condolences to Carris's family and embodies the spirit of gratitude towards those who positively affect society. The resolutions of this nature typically do not alter statutory law but rather serve to honor individuals and their legacies, setting a precedent for recognizing civic leaders.

Summary

HCR178 is a House concurrent resolution serving as a tribute to the late former Senator William H. Carris, who made significant contributions to Vermont through both his business and public service. The resolution highlights Carris's roots in Vermont, his accomplishments as a Junior Olympic ski jumper, and his transformative leadership at Carris Reels, where he implemented an employee stock ownership plan to benefit his employees. The overall tone of the bill is one of respect and admiration for Carris's legacy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR178 is overwhelmingly positive, characterized by feelings of gratitude and respect for Carris's impact on his community and state. Lawmakers from both the House and Senate have united in offering condolences, reflecting a bipartisan acknowledgment of Carris's contributions and the void left by his passing. The resolution serves to emphasize the value of public service in Vermont and connects citizens through shared recognition of local figures.

Contention

As a concurrent resolution, HCR178 does not appear to carry any notable points of contention, as it is primarily a statement of remembrance rather than a debate on legislative policy. Resolutions of this nature are often passed with little opposition since they focus on commemorating individuals rather than enacting or modifying laws, which might invite differing opinions.