Kelly Anthon — Kelly Anthon opened debate on the amendment to Section 3 of House Bill 680, explained that the amendment would carve out a couple of exceptions, and then closed debate on the amendment, after which the committee voted to adopt it.
Treg Bernt — Treg Bernt was called during roll call.
Carl Bjerke — Carl Bjerke was called during roll call.
Christy Zito — Christy Zito is called during roll call.
Christy Zito — Asked for an aye vote and moved to close debate on the bill.
Christy Zito — Said he still struggles with the rules, urged an aye vote, and thanked the senator from 23 for comments and work on the bill.
Christy Zito — Referenced in the chair's recognition and closing sequence.
Christy Zito — Thanked the senator from 23 for comments and work on the bill; the exact identity of the senator from 23 is unclear from the transcript.
Christy Zito — Requested unanimous consent to reuse the roll call vote from passage of another bill for House Bill 727.
Christy Zito — Asked whether House Bill 542 as amended in the Senate was in the order of business and then moved to bring it to the top of the calendar.
Christy Zito — Requested unanimous consent to dispense with further reading of House Bill 542 and place it before the Senate for final approval.
Christy Zito — Opened debate on House Bill 542 and described it as the 'Shazam Act' aimed at protecting kids from addictive social media.
Christy Zito — Objected to a statement; the chair responded that the objection was noted.
Christy Zito — Senator Blaylock explains that while she initially wanted to support the bill because its intention is good, she changed her view after doing more research and reading 'Stolen Focus.' She says her main concern is not the bill’s purpose but whether it will hold up legally. She emphasizes that parents are capable of parenting their own children, describes the phone and social media rules she has set in her home, and concludes that parents should be the ones protecting their children.
Brandon Shippy — Brandon Shippy is called during roll call and his name is repeated across consecutive mentions as part of the attendance check.
Brandon Shippy — Argues the bill restores local control to private property owners rather than taking it away.
Cindy Carlson — Cindy Carlson is called during roll call multiple times as part of the same procedural attendance check.
Kevin Cook — Kevin Cook was called during roll call.
Kevin Cook — Senator Cook speaks in favor of respecting existing zoning expectations and property rights tied to the rules in place when property was purchased.
Kevin Cook — Senator Kaiser responds by criticizing the bill for lacking affordability and family-sale requirements.
Kevin Cook — Senator Kaiser is called on procedurally, but the transcript is garbled.
Kevin Cook — Senator Kaiser is referenced in the procedural exchange before Senator Guthrie speaks.
Kevin Cook — Recognized by the chair to debate; begins brief remarks in favor of the bill.
Daniel Foreman — Name called during roll call.
Daniel Foreman — Speaker is addressed as Senator Denhardtog, likely a mis-transcription of a senator's name; uncertain match.
Codi Galloway — Name called during roll call.
Codi Galloway — Senator Galloway sought unanimous consent to dispense with further reading of Senate Bill 1294 as amended.
Codi Galloway — Senator Galloway corrected herself after initially reading the wrong bill/reference and restated the unanimous consent request for Senate Bill 1294.
Codi Galloway — Senator Galloway opened debate on Senate Bill 1294 and described it as a constituent bill about hearing screenings.
Codi Galloway — Senator Galloway closed debate after presenting the bill and its support base.
Codi Galloway — Senator Galloway speaks in support of the bill, framing it as a family and opportunity issue. She shares a personal perspective from growing up in District 15 and says housing is no longer affordable for young people who want to return home. She concludes that the bill will help Idaho families and young people stay in Idaho.
Codi Galloway — Senator Codi Galloway requests to make a Rule 39H declaration and explains it by sharing that her 23-year-old son recently bought his first home with an ADU, and her daughter is also looking for a similar housing option.
Codi Galloway — Roll call records an aye vote.
Codi Galloway — Recorded as voting aye; name appears repeated/garbled.
Mark Harris — During roll call, Mark Harris is named and later acknowledged as present, with one mention appearing as a transcription variant ('Groh') and another explicitly stating, 'We acknowledge the presence of Senator Groh.' Together, these references indicate the member’s presence being recorded during the meeting.
Mark Harris — Noted as having come in during the 11th order.
Mark Harris — Asked to come forward and chair the Committee of the Whole Senate.
Mark Harris — Seconded the motion on the amendment.
Mark Harris — Mark Harris presented the committee report to the Senate and then moved for its adoption, which was subsequently put to a vote and adopted.
Mark Harris — Requests unanimous consent to dispense with further reading of Senate Bill 1391.
Mark Harris — Opens debate on Senate Bill 1391 and explains that it fixes an issue created by Senate Bill 1326 affecting publicly employed land surveyors.
Mark Harris — Recognized to close debate.
Mark Harris — Closed debate on Senate Bill 1391 and moved to the roll call vote.
Mark Harris — Included in the roll call for Senate Bill 1391.
Mark Harris — Appears in the roll call vote on Senate Bill 1391.
Mark Harris — Requested unanimous consent to dispense with further reading of House Bill 727.
Phil Hart — Phil Hart was called during roll call.
Todd Lakey — Todd Lakey is mentioned during roll call and later identified as chairman in both the journal report and the committee report, indicating his attendance and leadership role in the meeting.
Todd Lakey — Senator Lakey was recognized and then introduced Ella Lukengay and her husband to the chamber.
Todd Lakey — Senator Lakey was involved in the procedural handling of an amendment: he seconded the motion, moved the amendment and opened debate by explaining it corrected terminology related to appropriations, later closed debate on the amendment to Section 1, and was again referenced in connection with the amendment’s seconding.