Steve Miller — His question about grazing land prompted an explanation of how an RV park proposal might work.
Steve Miller — Director Miller is referenced as the person being asked questions.
Steve Miller — Director Miller is referenced as having the relevant information about the MOU.
Steve Miller — Director Miller is said to be correct about the MOU process.
Steve Miller — Director Miller is again referenced in the discussion of the MOU process.
Steve Miller — Asked what counts as recreation and how many recreational development applications Lands has received in the last five years.
Steve Miller — Representative Miller is invited to follow up after the list of recreation uses is described.
Steve Miller — Said he views some recreation as informal activity and asked how many formal applications Lands has received in the last five years.
Steve Miller — Director Miller responds to Representative Miller's question about recreation on endowment lands.
Steve Miller — Asked whether the legislation would affect the existing MOU with Fish and Game.
Steve Miller — Asked to confirm understanding of the question.
Steve Miller — Expressed concern that the bill would promote recreation more broadly and said he is not ready to support it yet.
Steve Miller — Explained that fees go into the earnings reserve account for the relevant endowment, especially public schools.
Steve Miller — Responded that the intent is not to create a new park but to provide additional recreation opportunities.
Steve Miller — His concerns are referenced in the closing remarks.
Steve Miller — His concerns were referenced in the discussion about endowment land use and conflicts with glamping.
Steve Miller — Voted no.
Steve Miller — The speaker was thanked by name after his remarks.
Steve Miller — Voted nay.
Judy Boyle — Representative Boyle discusses docket 13-0108-2401, raising concerns that the rule package may conflict with state statutes and noting that supporting materials were provided to the committee. He then moves to adopt the docket with an exception for section 410, subsections 04(G) and (H).
Judy Boyle — Is asked to repeat the motion or accepted sections.
Judy Boyle — Restates her motion to adopt docket 13-0108-2401 except for section 410, subsection 04, G and H.
Judy Boyle — Her motion is described as a good motion and as addressing the main concerns.
Judy Boyle — Chair references Representative Boyle's earlier comments indirectly through the discussion.
Judy Boyle — Speaker references Representative Boyle's point that the process was not properly followed.
Judy Boyle — Representative Boyle speaks in support of rejecting the rules and references predator issues since wolves were introduced.
Judy Boyle — Voted yes on the motion.
Judy Boyle — Raised a question about the new code language on page three, line 11.
Judy Boyle — Questioned who can say no under the approval language and whether the bill interferes with the Land Board's authority.
Judy Boyle — Continued asking whether the MOUs use the same approval language as the bill.
Judy Boyle — The director addresses Representative Boyle's question about the MOU language.
Judy Boyle — Director Buxton responds to Representative Boyle's question about approval authority under the MOUs.
Judy Boyle — Pressed for clarification on whether the MOUs require approval or merely consultation.
Judy Boyle — Continued pressing on whether the MOUs contain mandatory approval language.
Judy Boyle — Asked why legislation is needed if the MOUs are already working.
Judy Boyle — Asked whether the legislation would cancel the existing arrangement for Parks and Rec.
Judy Boyle — Clarified that the question concerns the northern area with private and state land.
Judy Boyle — Judy Boyle responds to the discussion by saying she looked into the glamping proposal and notes that the grazing lease still exists on the land. She argues that endowment land is not public land but land held for beneficiaries, and it should continue to generate revenue through uses such as grazing, timber, and mining. The sequence ends with a roll-call mention of Representative Boyle.
Judy Boyle — Judy Boyle was acknowledged in the discussion and then recorded as voting no on the motion.
James Petzke — Asked whether the department could respond to the question of whether the rule is in conflict with statute.
James Petzke — Said technology is changing hunting success rates and that the issue must be addressed statewide.
James Petzke — Chair refers to Representative Petzke's point about the technology's effectiveness.
James Petzke — Chair continues the point that the technology is effective for wolf hunters.
James Petzke — Speaker agrees with Representative Petzke that the price of the technology is coming down.
James Petzke — Speaker again agrees that the technology is becoming cheaper and more common.
James Petzke — Said the issue is complex and noted he had already addressed one small portion of it through legislation that passed the House and Senate.
James Petzke — Was asked whether he had an RS and replied that he did not personally have it but believed one existed.
James Petzke — Said he had seen the RS and that it keeps the same restrictions but carves out predators.
James Petzke — Voted aye on the motion.
James Petzke — Called during roll call; transcript says Petke.