Jason Monks — Representative Jason Monks introduced RS 33675 and explained that it concerns the bed tax, including how bed-tax revenues are distributed and the proposed change allowing universities to apply for grant funds. He continued clarifying the grant process and answered a question confirming that the proposal would not affect auditorium district room-tax collections.
Steve Berch — Representative Steve Berch is first referenced in the motion/vote context for introducing RS-33606, then he follows up by asking what harm or negative consequence resulted from the transaction that prompted the legislation, seeking to understand the basis for the bill.
Douglas Pickett — Moved to introduce RS-33614.
Douglas Pickett — Discussed withdrawing the original motion in favor of a substitute motion.
Douglas Pickett — Not directly mentioned; no clear reference in this section.
Douglas Pickett — A name appears as 'Representative Rebell,' likely a transcription error for a member not in the expected list; not confidently identifiable.
Douglas Pickett — Asked whether the bill would affect law enforcement's ability to exhume a body.
Douglas Pickett — Asked whether the proposal is a split-out version of a previous bill.
Douglas Pickett — Questioned why the bill grants access regardless of custodial status in cases where a parent has been shut out for valid reasons.
Douglas Pickett — Raised concern about access regardless of custodial status and whether that could undermine child protection.
Douglas Pickett — Continued questioning the bill's equal-access language despite custodial status.
Douglas Pickett — Questioned whether the 'equal access' and 'regardless of custodial legal status' language conflicts.
Douglas Pickett — Asked whether the bill would go to the Germain Committee and then moved introduction of RS 33666.
Douglas Pickett — Recognized as the member who would handle the motion to introduce the RS.
Douglas Pickett — Responded that he would move the introduction of RS 33667.
Douglas Pickett — Representative Douglas Pickett was identified as the member handling the introduction and then moved the introduction of RS 33675, with the motion repeated in overlapping transcript segments.
Jaron Crane — Offered a substitute motion to send RS-33614 to the second reading calendar.
Jaron Crane — Asked to proceed and then moved to introduce the RS in the next section.
Jaron Crane — Moved to introduce RS-3364 with proposed amendments limiting public records access to ethics committee work.
Jaron Crane — The question continues from the prior section and concerns whether a victim could have an attorney present during ethics committee information gathering.
Jaron Crane — The question about attorney presence in ethics hearings continues, with the speaker responding to the hypothetical involving a minor and a criminal act.
Jaron Crane — Was called on after the presentation.
Jaron Crane — Asked whether the out-of-state license fees had been considered for increase.
Jaron Crane — Made a joking comment during discussion of the motion.
Jaron Crane — Moved to introduce RS 33668.
Jaron Crane — Moved to introduce RS 33668.
Jaron Crane — Moved to introduce RS 33615.
Ilana Rubel — Representative Birch is addressed multiple times during the discussion, and later states opposition to the motion, citing concern about legal representation in ethics investigations.
Ilana Rubel — Representative Birch questioned whether the bill should require make-up time in all circumstances or instead allow judges discretion on a case-by-case basis, expressing concern that mandatory language could be disruptive. She also asked whether the proposal would affect auditorium district room-tax collections, specifically whether it would change what an auditorium district receives from the room tax.
Monica Church — No clear reference in this section; not identified as speaking.
Monica Church — Explained the purpose of the RS as closing a loophole that lets people move to Idaho briefly to qualify for a lifetime hunting license.
Monica Church — Responded that the fees are in rule and acknowledged the concern.
Monica Church — Was invited to present the next RS.
Monica Church — Answered that the industry was 'home decor' and offered to send links by email.
Monica Church — Clarified that such memorial products would be exempt and that the bill targets actual body parts and skeletons.
Monica Church — Answered that the bill would not affect law enforcement because of multiple exemptions.
Monica Church — Was invited to present the next RS, 33666.
Monica Church — Introduced RS 33666, which strengthens parents' access to records and information about a minor child.
Monica Church — Explained that the language came from House Bill 824 and was being broken into smaller pieces.
Monica Church — Responded that a parent without custody would not have access and that access can be restricted by court order to prevent substantial harm.
Monica Church — Clarified that the bill is being split from House Bill 824 into smaller pieces and responded to concerns about custodial status.
Monica Church — Explained that noncustodial parents would not have access and that a court order can restrict access to prevent substantial harm.
Monica Church — Explained that the original House bill was split into individual parts and that the chairman agreed to hear them individually.
Monica Church — Introduced RS 33667 and explained it would limit court-appointed professionals to an advisory role while leaving final custody and parenting decisions to the court.
Monica Church — Continued explaining RS 33667, emphasizing that the judge should retain final decision-making authority.
Monica Church — Finished presenting RS 33667 and asked for introduction.
Monica Church — Called back to present the next RS after RS 33667 was introduced.
Monica Church — Introduced RS 33668 and explained it addresses misuse of custody allegations in contentious cases.
Monica Church — Her RS 33668 is the subject of the motion and discussion.