Mark Harris — Representative Nicholson was called on to ask a question.
Mark Harris — Representative Diger was addressed in the question period.
Mark Harris — The question continued about whether elected boards would have to file with the county clerk.
Mark Harris — Representative Diger was addressed in response to the question.
Mark Harris — The speaker referenced a member's earlier presentation and then explained the filing process for subdivisions.
Mark Harris — The speaker joked about the committee and then identified himself as Representative Barbieri from District 3.
Mark Harris — Representative Barbieri was thanked after noting the bill passed the Senate unanimously.
Mark Harris — Representative Mickelson made a motion on Senate Bill 1299 and asked whether the bill would prohibit future use of digital IDs.
Mark Harris — The discussion continues on the concern that the bill could put the state in conflict with the federal government.
Mark Harris — Responded briefly with no comment to the question from the chair.
Mark Harris — The chair asked if there were any further questions.
Brandon Shippy — Spoke in favor of the motion and said the U.K. has mandated digital ID for work, supporting the bill's direction.
Mark Harris — Representative Harris raised concern that requiring filings at the county clerk's office could have a chilling effect on candidates.
Mark Harris — Representative Harris continued his concern that requiring filings at the county clerk's office may be less accessible than filing locally.
Mark Harris — Representative Harris was addressed in response to his concern.
Mark Harris — Representative Alfieri was addressed by name in the response.
Mark Harris — The speaker continued explaining why the filing change should be workable.
James Ruchti — Representative Scott responded to questions about the bill’s handling of appointments and confirmation authority, explaining that it preserves Senate confirmation power, that any conflicts are resolved later when session bills become session law and are cleaned up by codifiers, and that the bill is aimed at rejected appointments subject to Senate advice and consent rather than unconfirmed state employees.
James Ruchti — Representative Church asked whether federal digital ID requirements were discussed for programs worked on with the federal government.