Jordan Redman — Called up to present the first RS.
Jordan Redman — Introduced as the presenter of RS 33297C1.
Jordan Redman — Introduced himself and presented RS 33297C1.
Jordan Redman — Was invited to present the RS.
Jordan Redman — Asked for introduction of RS 33297C1.
Jordan Redman — Questioned the presenter about outside review.
Jordan Redman — Asked whether the proposal had been reviewed by firefighting stakeholders.
Jordan Redman — Explained that firefighters had been consulted and hoped they might be neutral.
Jordan Redman — Said the RS would go to the business committee.
Jordan Redman — Presented RS 33501.
Jordan Redman — Presented RS 33501 and was called to present the next RS.
Jordan Redman — Introduced RS 33522C1 and described it as a faith-based housing proposal.
Jordan Redman — Acknowledged in the exchange before the motion.
Jordan Redman — Was asked why homeless shelters were removed as an option.
Jordan Redman — Said the homeless-shelter option was removed based on feedback.
Jordan Redman — Raised a question about the definition of religious land.
Jordan Redman — Explained how long-term leases and landholding arrangements would address the issue.
Jordan Redman — Asked about the remedy for the land issue.
Jordan Redman — Presented the next RS, RS 33572.
Jordan Redman — Presented RS 33572.
Jordan Redman — Presented the RS and described its guardrails and purpose.
Jordan Redman — Referenced as the sponsor being thanked after presentation.
Jordan Redman — Questioned about business community input on the proposal.
Jordan Redman — Said he had no direct business-community feedback but guessed the business community would favor the proposal because it gives landowners more options.
Jordan Redman — Noted that this proposal had the most interest of the four discussed that day.
Jordan Redman — Acknowledged that this proposal had the most interest and said he looked forward to speaking further.
Jordan Redman — The transcript contains a likely misrecognition earlier, but here the question is directed to Representative Skaug.
Brent Crane — Representative Brent Crane is acknowledged in connection with the Rule 80 declaration.
Jason Monks — Moved to introduce RS 33501.
Jason Monks — Representative Monks is introduced as the presenter for RS 33465, asks permission to briefly hold up a prop, then points out a couple of drafting typos and explains the intent to move the RS quickly so it can be heard on the House floor for Idaho Day. He also says he was asked to sponsor the RS and is willing to gather a co-sponsor list, after which the motion to introduce RS 33465 carries.
Monica Church — Representative Church questioned why homeless shelters were removed from the proposal, essentially repeating and reinforcing the same concern across the two consecutive mentions.
Heather Scott — Heather Scott is introduced multiple times in succession as the next presenter on the agenda, including immediately after the RS 33572 vote, with no substantive discussion beyond the transition to her presentation.
Bruce Skaug — Bruce Skaug presents RS 33553 and explains that the bill updates confidentiality protections in light of Idaho’s use of firing squad as the primary execution method. He moves to introduce the bill, then responds to committee questions by clarifying that condemned individuals still retain the ability to bring as-applied constitutional challenges, even though that right is not specifically spelled out in the bill. He also explains that confidentiality may be necessary for a group involved in preparing executions, including the Idaho Department of Corrections director, as the committee discusses the bill’s disclosure limits.
Cornel Rasor — Thanked after being addressed as Representative Pickett in the transcript; likely a transcription error, but the spoken text references Representative Pickett.
Ilana Rubel — Raises a question about whether the confidentiality provisions would prevent litigation over Eighth Amendment or other constitutional claims.
Ilana Rubel — Asks how litigation would proceed if execution-related information is shielded from disclosure.
Ilana Rubel — Asked to clarify where the constitutional challenge right appears in the bill.
Ilana Rubel — States opposition to the bill based on transparency concerns and the need for oversight when the state carries out an execution.
Ilana Rubel — Recorded as voting nay on the motion to introduce RS 33553.
Joe Palmer — The chair warmly welcomed Representative Joe Palmer back and expressed gladness to see him before proceeding to the next item of business.
Jaron Crane — Representative Jaron Crane introduced RS 33360C1, explaining that it would allow single-county highway districts to serve streets when a city expands into another county. He described the issue using the City of Star’s growth toward Canyon County and noted that he had spoken with his mayor, who said the legislation would be helpful and that cities support it. The discussion concluded with the motion to introduce RS 33360C1.
Jerald Raymond — Representative Birch asked whether a specific situation was prompting the legislation and then inquired where the Association of Counties stood on the issue. He concluded by saying he would support the motion, but believed it would be reasonable for counties to weigh in because the bill would become statewide law.
Lyndon Bateman — A tribute to Lyndon Bateman highlighting his deep love of Idaho and history, crediting him with Idaho Day, and noting the widespread admiration and positive impact he has had on people in Idaho.
Lyndon's drawings / handwritten notes — Representative Monks described drawings and handwritten notes by Lyndon Bateman as cherished keepsakes.
James Petzke — Made the motion to introduce the RS with corrections and send it to the second reading calendar.
Melissa Wintrow — Representative Rubel responded to the sponsor by saying she would be thrilled to co-sponsor the bill and enthusiastically expressed support for joining on as a co-sponsor. A later brief reference to her name simply noted that she had already indicated support for co-sponsoring the RS.
Representative Bateman — Representative Bateman is warmly praised and remembered fondly, with the speaker describing him as one of their dearest friends in the building and saying they love him beyond words.