Timothy Dunn — Timothy Dunn is called during roll call and then introduces himself as Senator Tim Dunn from Legislative District 25, noting he represents Yuma and the West Valley.
Timothy Dunn — Senator Dunn repeatedly questions whether SB 1055 is necessary, arguing that the issue is already covered by existing statute and that the witness’s responses confirm his view that current law already addresses the conduct and related legal remedies.
Timothy Dunn — Senator Dunn is addressed during a clarification of the appropriation amount.
Flavio Bravo — Called during roll call; transcript briefly self-corrects to 'me.'
Flavio Bravo — Senator Gonzalez is addressed in the exchange about the difference between a stop and detention.
Stephanie Hamilton — Senator Miranda is called during roll call and marked present, then is called again in the sequence as the meeting proceeds.
Stephanie Hamilton — Likely intended as Senator Miranda, who is addressed by name in the exchange.
Wendy Rogers — Wendy Rogers is first called and present, then introduces herself as representing Legislative District 7. She later participates in the committee discussion on the bill, being called on multiple times and responding to questions and criticism about why the bill is needed, whether it addresses agencies exploiting federal immigration law, and concerns described as 'salt in the wound.' Throughout the exchange, she emphasizes that the law is the law, rejects emotional framing, and declines to engage further on what she sees as non-germane points.
Wendy Rogers — Identified as the sponsor of the bill and the person the question should be directed to.
Wendy Rogers — The question is directed to Senator Rogers as the bill sponsor.
Wendy Rogers — Asked to elaborate on why the amendment would not clash with existing law.
Wendy Rogers — The speaker asks Senator Rogers a question about timing and whether the discussion concerns a stop.
Wendy Rogers — The speaker asks Senator Rogers to explain the difference between a stop, arrest, and detention.
Wendy Rogers — The speaker says they disagree with Senator Rogers' bill.
Wendy Rogers — Was directly addressed in criticism of the bill and its enforcement implications.
Wendy Rogers — Requests to explain her vote and begins responding to prior testimony.
Wendy Rogers — The chair tells her to continue speaking after an interruption.
Wendy Rogers — Directly addressed and criticized by name.
Wendy Rogers — Referenced as the senator closing ambiguity in the bill.
Wendy Rogers — Referenced in the discussion of committee procedure and speaking rights.
Wendy Rogers — The speaker refers to a colleague as 'Senator Champ,' likely meaning Senator Rogers or another senator; the name is uncertain.
Wendy Rogers — A colleague is referenced as being allowed to address the committee freely; the name is uncertain in the transcript.
Wendy Rogers — A senator is referenced again as 'Senator Schamp'; the name is uncertain.
Wendy Rogers — Senator Rogers is identified as speaking in support of the bill.
Wendy Rogers — Senator Rogers continues advocating for the bill and answers questions.
Wendy Rogers — Explains that the amount was calculated based on dives and veterans served, with possible future appropriations.
Wendy Rogers — Responds that female veterans are included and then moves SB 1065 with a do pass recommendation.
Wendy Rogers — Addressed by another member before responding; the transcript indicates she is speaking in support of the measure.
Wendy Rogers — Praised for continuing to pursue the measure.
Hildy Angius — Hildy Angius calls Senator Sears present and then introduces him, with the transcript inconsistently referring to him as Senator Sears and noting him as representing Legislative District 9.
Hildy Angius — Called on after the speaker votes aye.
Hildy Angius — The chair warns the room and addresses Senator Sears.
Hildy Angius — Is called on to explain her vote.
Hildy Angius — Explains her vote by referencing faith, her father being a veteran, and concerns about detained or arrested veterans.
Hildy Angius — Continues explaining opposition to the bill, arguing it is redundant and discussing arrest data and ethnicity.
Hildy Angius — Continues her opposition, citing community impacts, race, and children.
Hildy Angius — Possibly referenced as 'Champ' or 'Sears' in a garbled address; uncertain.
Janae Shamp — Called during roll call.
Janae Shamp — Senator Janae Shamp asked whether the proposed language would clarify the statute and remove the need for an Attorney General's opinion, and the witness responded to her question.
David Gowan — Called and marked here; transcript says 'Gowin,' likely Gowan.
Catherine Miranda — Introduced herself as Assistant Leader from District 11.
Sally Gonzales — Senator Sally Gonzales introduced herself and identified her representation of District 20 in Southern Arizona.
Sally Gonzales — Senator Sally Gonzales discussed whether the proposed amendment would conflict with or complicate existing statutes, citing statute 23-212.01 and pressing the witness on whether the measure would create confusion in current law. The exchange continued into the witness’s response to her concerns.
Sally Gonzales — Argues SB 1055 is unnecessary and will increase fear in communities.
Sally Gonzales — The speaker answers Senator Gonzales's question about how veterans would be selected.
Brooke Hoopenthal — Brooke Hoopenthal introduced herself as the Deputy General Counsel for the Senate Majority and advisor to the Military and Border Security Committee and Judiciary Committee. A few minutes later, the chair briefly referenced her again and decided not to have her repeat the introduction.
Paulino Valerio — Introduced himself as Chief of Staff for the Senate Democratic Caucus and said he is covering until a new hire begins.
Ada Martinez — Introduced herself as an Arizona State University student from Mesa.
Keana Araza — Introduced herself as a research analyst for Military Affairs and Border Security and Public Safety.
Kendall Mullins — Introduced himself as Senate Research Intern for the committee and Public Safety Committee.