Keith Wagoner — Introduced himself as Senator Keith Wagner/Wagoner, representing the 39th legislative district and serving on several committees; said he formerly was ranking member on the behavioral health subcommittee.
Chris Stearns — Likely referenced by first name only as 'Chris' in the context of other work groups; identification is probable but not certain from this section alone.
Tana Senn — Referenced as having raised the need for an executive-level role multiple times when she was co-chair.
Tana Senn — Referenced as having been interested in the executive-level role issue before becoming secretary.
Laura — Laura is given the floor, briefly clarifies a prior exchange, then offers her main comments and notes she may have additional questions later. The discussion concludes with another speaker affirming that Laura’s point about centering people and families is well taken.
Laura — Laura briefly explained that she had notified her network and the peer community about the meetings and directed people to the website to submit public comments. The exchange then concluded with a brief thank-you to Laura.
Laura — Was thanked by the speaker before the speaker moved to a general comment on cross-agency work.
Laura — Laura asks whether the report includes accountability or oversight recommendations. The speaker initially cannot answer her question, and someone notes that Laura is on mute. Later, the discussion returns to Laura’s request and confirms that the requested accountability language can be added.
Caitlin — Caitlin is identified as the speaker being handed off to, but no last name is provided.
Caitlin — The speaker says 'evidence-informed' helps and addresses Caitlin directly.
Caitlin — Caitlin was thanked twice for helping move the discussion forward by suggesting a quicker approach and encouraging the committee to focus on broader feedback.
Caitlin — Caitlin is referenced as a possible source of background, then speaks to suggest adding language about community voice and accountability in the vision document. She is included in the group that will continue drafting offline, invited to give the final word, and closes by thanking everyone for their engagement and for working through the leadership and government transition.
Jane — Jane is repeatedly acknowledged as wanting to speak, with the chair noting her raised hand, confirming whether she is next, and then promising to address her question.
Jane — Welcomed to the meeting.
Jane — Jane notes that behavioral health lacks sufficient resources devoted to studying what works, and the discussion then turns to whether 'evidence-informed' would be a better term for describing that approach.
Jane — Thanked for the prior input before the time check was raised.
Jane — Asked to send the edited document and suggested language for modifying the recommendation.
Carolyn Eslick — Carolyn Eslick identifies herself and says the P-25 plan will be finalized this year.
Anna — Mentioned as someone the speaker tried to network with about public engagement.
Anna — Was asked for thoughts from the perspective of NAMI.
Anna — Anna asks whether the planning committee will help with the final draft report and notes feedback about reorganization and rewording.
Anna — Anna's suggestion to help with the final draft is acknowledged positively.
Anna — Anna is thanked for offering help on the report.
Kaylee — Mentioned as someone the speaker tried to network with about public engagement.
Kaylee — Kaylee is included in the group that will sort out the draft work offline.
Vicki — Welcomed to the meeting.
Vicki — The speaker discusses Vicki’s earlier concerns about the draft language, especially the wording around 'evidence-based' programs. They clarify that bolding was only for readability and not meant for the final report, thank Vicki for catching an oversight, and later refer back to her concern and note that she is nodding in agreement.
Liz — Addressed to take over the discussion and ask about priorities 3 through 6.
Liz — The speaker noted that Liz was muted.
Liz — The group is ready to return to the slides.
Liz — Liz is thanked for work on the report.
Karen — Karen is referenced as having previously explained the formatting changes and summarized the source of the recommendations, indicating her earlier remarks provided the basis for the discussion.
Karen — The speaker said they would send the document to Karen.
Karen — Karen is thanked for work on the report.
Teresa — Teresa asks about the document’s bold formatting, questioning why certain text is bolded and whether the bolding serves a specific purpose for readers.
Teresa — Teresa was identified as having served on the subcommittee discussing the layers providers must go through, and the group then suggested working with her to reframe the recommendation on that issue.
Jeff Wilson — Senator Wilson is welcomed after joining late and is associated with the discussion of early intervention, especially birth-to-three services and ESIT. He is then repeatedly referenced in the ongoing exchange about screening, early practices, and a continuum of care document, with the discussion remaining focused on early childhood intervention and related care approaches.
Liz Berry — Referenced as supporting the approach of using the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Work Group document as a model.
Lacey — Referenced as part of a prior point being expanded upon regarding credentialing requirements.
Brian — Invited to speak after the request for edits; likely the next speaker.
Lauren — Asked whether there are any additional recommendations to call attention to before the next draft.
Edline — Edline is mentioned as part of the small team finishing the report and is later thanked, along with Karen and Liz, for her work on the report as a whole.