Virginia 2026 Regular Session

Virginia Senate Bill SB376

Introduced
1/13/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Report Pass
2/4/26  
Report Pass
2/11/26  
Engrossed
2/13/26  
Engrossed
2/13/26  
Refer
2/19/26  

Caption

A BILL to amend and reenact ยง 46.2-373 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 8.01-417.02, relating to motor vehicle collisions; preservation and collection of certain mobile telephone data; collision reports.

Impact

The bill can significantly impact state laws by modifying how collision reports are generated and what information is included. It mandates that law enforcement provide mobile telephone numbers, provider details, and any information on whether drivers used mobile applications or devices to monitor their driving at the time of the collision. This requirement not only streamlines access to critical data for attorneys but also may raise privacy concerns regarding how mobile data is handled and shared among various parties, including law enforcement and insurance companies.

Summary

Senate Bill 376 addresses the preservation and collection of mobile telephone data in the context of motor vehicle collisions. This legislation seeks to allow attorneys representing parties involved in such collisions to request the preservation of specific mobile telephone data for a period of 180 days. This data includes subscription details, call logs, and location information, which can be critical for understanding the circumstances leading to a collision. By defining the legal framework for data requests, SB376 aims to facilitate the investigation process in personal injury cases related to accidents.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards SB376 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill enhances accountability and streamlines the collection of pertinent evidence that can help in resolving legal disputes stemming from motor vehicle collisions. They emphasize the importance of preserving such data in a timely and organized manner. However, critics express concerns regarding the potential invasion of privacy and the implications for data security. The legislative discourse suggests a need to balance the benefits of data collection for legal processes with individuals' rights to privacy.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the implications of accessing and preserving mobile data for legal purposes. Opponents of the bill may argue that such access could lead to overreach, where personal data is collected without sufficient grounds or consent. Additionally, the bill may face scrutiny regarding its implementation, particularly how legal fees associated with obtaining such data could affect individuals involved in accidents. The legislative discussions have highlighted the need for clear guidelines to protect against misuse of collected information while ensuring that necessary evidence is not lost.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

VA SB1012

Motor vehicle collisions; collection of certain mobile telephone data, collision reports.

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

VA HB2059

Virginia's Great Outdoors Act; land preservation distributions and appropriations.

VA HB2195

Virginia Consumer Protection Act; mold remediation and inspections, report.

VA HB2492

Motor vehicle accidents; actions brought by uninsured motorists, limited damages.

VA HB2385

Motor vehicle accidents; actions brought by uninsured motorists, limited damages.

VA SB835

Virginia College Opportunity Endowment and Fund; established, report.

VA HB2256

Motor vehicle accident; increases damage threshold.

VA HB1903

Virginia Health Workforce Development Authority; Virginia Nursing Workforce Center established; reporting and monitoring of health care workforce programs; residency slots; work group; report.

VA SB1332

Towing and storage of certain vehicles; limitation on charges.

Similar Bills

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

TX HB2530

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

LA SB454

Provides for a population based allocation of assistant district attorney positions in the state. (7/1/26) (OR +$397,950 GF EX See Note)

LA HB719

Provides relative to the number of assistant district attorneys in each judicial district (RE +$2,274,000 GF EX See Note)

TX SB888

Relating to the attorney general's defense of a district or county attorney against certain lawsuits in federal court.

TX SB2501

Relating to selection of an attorney by an indigent parent as attorney ad litem for the parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB1026

Relating to the authority of the attorney general to prosecute criminal offenses prescribed by the election laws of this state.