House Resolution 66 is a ceremonial resolution commending Dave and Linda Cryer for their long record of community service in Middlesex County. The resolution highlights more than 23 years of volunteer leadership, philanthropy, and direct support for vulnerable residents, including the construction and donation of the Cryer Center in 2010, which serves as a hub for local outreach efforts.
The resolution specifically recognizes the Cryers’ support for programs housed at the Cryer Center, including Hands Across Middlesex, the Middlesex County Food Pantry, the Clothing Closet, and a community yard sale that provides food, clothing, and household goods to people in need. It also notes Dave Cryer’s leadership with the food pantry and his volunteer work delivering surplus food and furniture, as well as the couple’s foster parenting of more than 30 children and raising six children of their own. The measure directs the Clerk of the House of Delegates to present a copy of the resolution to the Cryers as an expression of the House’s admiration.
Impact
HR66 does not change state law, create new programs, or appropriate funds. Its effect is purely honorary: it formally recognizes private citizens for civic service and directs the preparation of an official copy for presentation. The resolution has no direct legal impact on statutes, agencies, or regulated parties, but it publicly elevates the Cryers’ charitable work and the community organizations associated with them.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the resolution is strongly positive and appreciative. The House agreed to the resolution without any recorded opposition, reflecting broad support for honoring the Cryers’ volunteerism, philanthropy, and service to families in Middlesex County. The tone of the bill text itself is celebratory and laudatory throughout.
Contention
There is no notable contention in the available record. The resolution is noncontroversial and ceremonial, and there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes indicating disagreement. Any discussion would likely center on the appropriateness of the commendation and the scope of the Cryers’ community contributions, but the available materials show unanimous praise rather than dispute.