House Joint Resolution 93 is a commemorative resolution honoring Walter Samson Howard III for his long record of service to the Chesapeake community and the Commonwealth. The resolution recounts his education at Fork Union Military Academy and the College of William & Mary, his work with Colonial Pipeline, and his later success in custom homebuilding and irrigation. It also highlights his personal and civic life, including his church membership, family involvement, and volunteer work.
The resolution specifically recognizes Howard’s charitable leadership through Great Bridge Presbyterian Church, his children’s schools and sports activities, and his service with the nonprofit ABBA List and the Chesapeake Area Shelter Team. It emphasizes his role as an elder in his church and as a member of the alumni board at Fork Union Military Academy, presenting him as a community leader whose faith and service have benefited vulnerable individuals and families in Chesapeake and beyond.
Impact
HJR93 does not change state law, create new programs, or appropriate funds. Its legal effect is limited to a formal expression of commendation by the General Assembly and an instruction to the Clerk of the House of Delegates to prepare a copy of the resolution for presentation to Walter Samson Howard III. The resolution has no direct impact on statutes, regulatory authority, or private rights, but it serves as an official legislative recognition of an individual’s civic contributions.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is entirely positive and appreciative. The bill passed both chambers without any recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, suggesting it was noncontroversial and broadly supported. The language of the resolution reflects admiration for Howard’s faith-based service, charitable work, and community leadership.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention in the available record. Because this is a ceremonial resolution honoring an individual, it does not appear to have generated policy disagreement, fiscal concerns, or partisan division. The absence of committee transcripts and recorded votes further indicates that the measure was likely routine and unanimously acceptable to legislators.