Virginia 2026 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB362

Introduced
1/12/26  
Refer
1/12/26  

Caption

<p class=ldtitle>A BILL to amend and reenact ยงยง 22.1-1, as it shall become effective, 22.1-238, as it is currently effective, and 22.1-241, as it is currently effective and as it shall become effective, of the Code of Virginia, relating to public elementary and secondary student textbooks; print as primary curriculum basis.</p>

Impact

This bill has the potential to significantly influence state education laws by prioritizing printed learning materials over digital ones, which reflects a shift in educational policy focused on various teaching methodologies. The intent is to identify how the exclusive use of printed materials impacts learning outcomes, providing a framework for future major educational decisions and potential reform across other Virginia school divisions.

Summary

House Bill 362 establishes a Printed Textbook Pilot Program aimed at enhancing educational outcomes by emphasizing printed textbooks and high-quality instructional materials as the primary curriculum for students in selected school divisions. The Virginia Department of Education is tasked with administering this program. It will select up to 10 school divisions based on various criteria, including performance and demographics, to participate in the program, which intends to provide grants for the purchase of printed textbooks without requiring a local match of funds.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 362 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Proponents advocate that focusing on printed textbooks could address issues related to student engagement and retention, particularly among younger and economically disadvantaged students. However, some educators and stakeholders have expressed concerns regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of relying solely on printed materials in an increasingly digital world.

Contention

Notably, points of contention have arisen concerning the implications of the pilot program on existing educational frameworks. Critics argue that the bill might limit the integration of technology in classrooms, which is crucial in preparing students for a modern workforce. Conversely, supporters emphasize the need for a foundational educational framework that printed materials provide, especially in the foundational stages of learning.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.