Virginia 2026 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB1311

Introduced
1/16/26  
Refer
1/16/26  
Report Pass
2/3/26  
Engrossed
2/6/26  
Refer
2/10/26  
Report Pass
2/18/26  
Enrolled
2/25/26  
Chaptered
4/6/26  
Passed
4/6/26  
Chaptered
4/6/26  

Caption

An Act to amend and reenact ยง 2.2-3106 of the Code of Virginia, relating to employees of state government; personal interest in certain contracts prohibited; certain exception for certain employees of the Virginia School for the Deaf and the Blind.

Impact

This legislation signifies a crucial step towards ensuring transparency and ethical governance within state agencies. By preventing conflicts of interest, HB 1311 seeks to uphold public trust in governmental transactions. The bill's provisions also introduce exceptions wherein contracts created due to familial relationships or published educational materials can still be pursued, ensuring that the law does not impede legitimate professional interests that align with public service.

Summary

House Bill 1311 aims to amend and reenact section 2.2-3106 of the Code of Virginia, primarily focusing on prohibiting employees and officers of state government from holding personal interests in contracts with their governmental agencies. The bill sets forth clear boundaries around conflicts of interest, emphasizing that no state officer or employee should have a personal stake in contracts, except under specific conditions such as competitive bidding or written findings of public interest.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1311 appears generally supportive among legislators and advocacy groups that emphasize transparency and accountability in government. However, there may exist concerns about the implications for state employees who could face limitations regarding legitimate familial employment opportunities. Thus, while many view the bill as a necessary reform, some reservations about its effects on personal freedoms and employment options for state employees remain evident.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the specific exceptions outlined in the bill. Critics may argue that the proposed exemptions could potentially introduce loopholes that would allow conflicts of interest to persist in practice. On the other hand, supporters assert that these exceptions are necessary to balance ethical concerns with the realities of state employment and family ties, reflecting a need for a measured approach to governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.