Virginia 2026 1st Special Session

Virginia House Bill HB571

Caption

A BILL to amend and reenact § 33.2-3701 of the Code of Virginia, relating to Central Virginia Transportation Fund; distribution of funds; Bay Transit.

Summary

HB571 amends the statute governing the Central Virginia Transportation Fund for Planning District 15. The bill keeps the fund as a special nonreverting treasury fund and continues to dedicate revenues to transportation purposes benefiting the localities in the district, along with authorized administrative and operating expenses. It also preserves existing rules that the money may not be used to reduce other state, federal, or local revenue shares, and that the funds are not counted in local education ability-to-pay calculations. The bill changes how the fund’s revenues are allocated after administrative costs. Under the introduced version, 35% would remain with the Authority for transportation-related purposes, 13% would go to GRTC for transit and mobility services, 50% would be returned to localities for local mobility projects, and 2% would go to Bay Transit. The bill also requires localities and GRTC to maintain separate special funds and provide documentation showing the money was used as required, and it directs the Authority to approve projects funded through the Authority and GRTC shares. Bay Transit funding would depend on an agreement with the Authority; if no agreement exists, Bay Transit’s share would instead go to GRTC under the same requirements. The bill’s impact on state law would be to amend § 33.2-3701 of the Code of Virginia to add Bay Transit as a recipient of a dedicated share of the Central Virginia Transportation Fund and to formalize the distribution, oversight, and reporting structure for those funds. It would also require the Authority to use an objective, quantifiable prioritization process for projects funded from the Authority’s share. The bill would therefore affect the Central Virginia Transportation Authority, GRTC, Bay Transit, and the participating localities in Planning District 15. The general sentiment reflected in the available record is limited because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes, and the bill was left in the House Transportation Committee. That procedural outcome suggests the measure did not advance, but the record does not show explicit support or opposition statements. The main point of contention appears to be the proposed redistribution of transportation revenues, especially the addition of a Bay Transit allocation and the reduction of GRTC’s share from 15% to 13% in the introduced text. The bill also creates a conditional fallback that would send Bay Transit’s share to GRTC if no agreement is reached, which may have implications for how regional transit funding is negotiated and administered.

Impact

HB571 would amend Virginia’s transportation-fund statute to change the allocation formula for the Central Virginia Transportation Fund and to add Bay Transit as a potential recipient of dedicated revenues. It would impose additional administrative requirements on the Authority, localities, and transit providers, including separate fund accounting, documentation, and project approval standards, while leaving intact the fund’s nonreverting status and its protections against affecting other revenue calculations.

Sentiment

There is no recorded committee debate or vote history in the provided materials, so the bill’s sentiment cannot be measured from testimony or roll call. The only observable outcome is that it was left in the House Transportation Committee, indicating it did not move forward in the process. Based on the text alone, the bill appears to be a targeted regional transportation funding adjustment rather than a broadly controversial policy change, but the lack of recorded discussion prevents a stronger assessment.

Contention

The likely areas of contention are the distribution of the fund among regional transit and local mobility uses, the addition of Bay Transit to the formula, and the reduction in GRTC’s share in the introduced version. Another possible issue is the Authority’s control over project approval and the conditional transfer of Bay Transit’s share to GRTC if no agreement exists, which could raise questions about regional equity, governance, and funding certainty among the affected transit providers and localities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.