Virginia 2026 1st Special Session

Virginia House Bill HB1165

Caption

An Act to require the Board of Education to amend its regulation relating to the qualifications of division superintendents.

Summary

HB1165 requires the Virginia Board of Education to amend its regulation governing qualifications for division superintendents. The bill directs the Board to add an express attestation of good character and demonstrated ability as an educational administrator for candidates seeking placement on the eligible superintendent list and for holders of a renewable division superintendent license. The bill also revises “Option IV” for superintendent eligibility. Under the amended option, a candidate must have a master’s degree, at least three years of successful full-time senior leadership experience, and either five years of successful educational experience with specified teaching and administrative components or a waiver granted by the Board after further review. In addition, the candidate must be recommended by a school board in a school division with fewer than 2,000 enrolled students. Existing Option IV superintendents may continue under the prior requirements if they were already employed under that option and remain continuously employed in Virginia.

Impact

HB1165 changes the regulatory framework for superintendent licensure by requiring the Board of Education to update 8VAC20-23-630. The bill affects the qualifications process for division superintendents, especially those seeking eligibility under Option IV and those in small school divisions. It preserves grandfathered treatment for current Option IV superintendents who continue uninterrupted employment, while tightening and clarifying the criteria for future candidates.

Sentiment

The available record shows no committee transcript or recorded vote data, so there is no documented debate or formal opposition in the provided materials. Based on the enacted text, the bill appears to reflect a policy preference for clearer qualification standards and a more structured waiver process rather than a controversial substantive policy shift.

Contention

The main potential point of contention is the balance between raising professional standards for division superintendents and preserving flexibility for small school divisions that may have difficulty recruiting candidates. The bill narrows Option IV by requiring specific experience, a school-board recommendation, and either qualifying educational experience or a Board-granted waiver. Another possible issue is the waiver authority itself, which gives the Board discretion to approve candidates who do not meet the full experience requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.