House Resolution 793 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life and service of Bismarck Myrick, Sr., of Portsmouth, who died on September 29, 2024. The resolution recounts his upbringing in Portsmouth, his graduation from I.C. Norcom High School, his military service in the U.S. Army, and his distinguished career as a diplomat in the U.S. Foreign Service. It highlights his service in Vietnam, his military decorations, and his later work as U.S. ambassador to Lesotho and Liberia, as well as his diplomatic leadership in South Africa during the transition from apartheid.
The resolution also recognizes his academic achievements, his long tenure as a faculty member and ambassador-in-residence at Old Dominion University, and the honors he received from military, academic, and civic institutions. It concludes by expressing the House of Delegates’ sorrow at his passing and directing the Clerk to present a copy of the resolution to his family as a formal expression of respect and remembrance.
Impact
This resolution does not change state law, create new programs, or impose any regulatory or fiscal requirements. Its legal effect is limited to an official legislative tribute, preserving the General Assembly’s recognition of Bismarck Myrick, Sr.’s contributions to the military, diplomacy, education, and the Portsmouth community. The only practical action required is the preparation and presentation of a copy of the resolution to his family.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly positive and respectful. The bill was agreed to by the House of Delegates, and the text reflects admiration for Myrick’s military valor, diplomatic service, academic mentorship, and civic standing. Because the measure is commemorative rather than policy-driven, there is no indication of partisan division or substantive opposition in the available record.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the available materials. The resolution is a ceremonial measure honoring a deceased public servant, and the context provided includes no committee debate, no recorded opposition, and no votes suggesting disagreement. Any discussion would likely have centered on the appropriateness of the tribute and the breadth of Myrick’s accomplishments, rather than on competing policy positions.