Celebrating the life of William Eugene Goodman, Jr.
Summary
House Resolution 593 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life and memory of William Eugene Goodman, Jr., who died on September 12, 2024. The resolution describes him as an entrepreneur, philanthropist, and community member in Suffolk, Virginia, noting his work founding Quality Tires and Auto Care, LLC and Good Guys Enterprise after attending Deep Creek High School and Tidewater Community College.
The resolution highlights Goodman’s charitable and civic involvement, including Christmas giveaways, back-to-school drives, participation in John F. Kennedy Middle School career day, and providing discounts to customers in need. It also emphasizes his efforts to support people who had been recently incarcerated, his devotion to family, and his active faith life through St. Paul Baptist Church and Hope City Church. The House resolves to express sorrow at his passing and to provide a copy of the resolution to his family as a formal tribute.
Impact
HR593 does not change state law, create new programs, or appropriate funds. Its legal effect is limited to an official expression of respect by the House of Delegates and the preparation of a presentation copy for the Goodman family. The resolution has no direct impact on statutes, agencies, or regulated parties, but it serves as a formal public recognition of Goodman’s contributions to the Suffolk community.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly positive and respectful. The bill was agreed to by the House of Delegates without any recorded opposition, reflecting a consensus that Goodman’s life and community service merited formal recognition. The tone of the resolution is memorial and celebratory, emphasizing gratitude for his generosity, faith, family commitment, and local impact.
Contention
There is no notable contention in the available record. The resolution is noncontroversial and purely commemorative, and there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes indicating disagreement. Any discussion would likely have centered on honoring Goodman’s community service and legacy rather than on policy differences.