Celebrating the life of the Honorable Robert G. Woodson, Jr.
Summary
House Joint Resolution 624 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life and public service of the Honorable Robert G. Woodson, Jr., a retired judge of Virginia’s 10th Judicial District. The resolution recounts his education at Virginia Commonwealth University and the University of Richmond, his admission to the Virginia bar, his early legal career in private practice, and his service as Commonwealth’s Attorney for Cumberland County before his appointment to the bench in 1995. It also notes that he served as a general district court judge until his retirement in 2019 and describes him as a jurist who served with fairness, wisdom, integrity, dedication, and distinction.
The resolution does not change substantive law, create new rights, or appropriate funds. Its legal effect is limited to an official expression of respect and condolence by the General Assembly and the preparation of a copy for presentation to his family. As a memorial measure, it functions as a ceremonial legislative act recognizing a deceased public servant and preserving that recognition in the official records of the Commonwealth.
Impact
HJR624 has no direct impact on Virginia statutes, regulations, or court procedures. It does not amend the Code of Virginia or alter the duties of any state or local office. Its practical effect is symbolic: it formally records the General Assembly’s tribute to Robert G. Woodson, Jr. and authorizes the Clerk of the House of Delegates to provide a copy of the resolution to his family.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly respectful and appreciative. The bill was agreed to by both chambers, reflecting bipartisan or at least noncontroversial support for honoring a longtime judge and public servant. The language of the resolution emphasizes sadness at his passing and admiration for his service, indicating a solemn commemorative tone rather than policy debate.
Contention
There is no notable contention in the available record. No committee transcripts, recorded votes, or amendments suggest disagreement, and the measure appears to have moved as a routine memorial resolution. Because it is purely honorary, there were no substantive policy issues, fiscal concerns, or legal objections raised in the materials provided.