Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB2599

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/13/25  
Report Pass
1/29/25  
Engrossed
2/3/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Engrossed
2/20/25  
Enrolled
3/7/25  
Chaptered
3/21/25  

Caption

Chief judges; designation of cases to be heard in the Twelfth Judicial District.

Summary

HB2599 authorizes the chief judges of the Twelfth Judicial District’s General District Court and Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court to designate one or more courtrooms in Colonial Heights as the place where certain civil or criminal cases with proper, preferred, or permissible venue in Chesterfield County may be tried. The bill is framed as an administrative and venue-management measure intended to help the district handle cases in the interest of justice, and it gives the chief judges authority to issue orders that direct Chesterfield County cases to Colonial Heights courtrooms. The bill also includes a sunset provision. Its authority expires once an additional judge and administrative staff are authorized and funded for the relevant courts in the Twelfth Judicial District, and once the Chesterfield County courthouse is expanded or renovated to provide needed courtroom and office space, or an alternate space is identified. In addition, no order may be issued to use Colonial Heights courtrooms for Chesterfield County cases until the City of Colonial Heights and Chesterfield County execute a memorandum of understanding setting the terms and conditions for that use.

Impact

HB2599 amends the Code of Virginia by adding a new section, § 16.1-69.35:3, creating a specific venue and courtroom designation mechanism for the Twelfth Judicial District. It temporarily supersedes conflicting venue provisions for general district and juvenile and domestic relations district court cases when the chief judges designate Colonial Heights courtrooms for Chesterfield County matters. The bill affects court administration, venue assignment, and interlocal coordination between Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights, while leaving the underlying substantive law for civil and criminal cases unchanged.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have enjoyed broad support throughout the legislative process. It advanced unanimously or near-unanimously in committee and subcommittee votes, passed the House by a substantial margin, passed the Senate unanimously, and the House later agreed to the Senate amendment with only one dissenting vote. The vote pattern suggests the measure was viewed as a practical, noncontroversial court-management solution rather than a policy dispute.

Contention

The main points of potential contention are procedural and local rather than ideological. The bill conditions implementation on a memorandum of understanding between the Colonial Heights city manager and the Chesterfield County administrator, indicating that local operational terms had to be negotiated before the courtroom designation could be used. Another possible concern is that the bill temporarily overrides other venue provisions, though only for the limited purpose of assigning certain Chesterfield County cases to Colonial Heights courtrooms and only until additional judicial and facility capacity becomes available in Chesterfield County.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.