Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB2536

Introduced
1/9/25  
Refer
1/9/25  
Report Pass
1/24/25  
Engrossed
1/29/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Enrolled
3/7/25  
Chaptered
3/19/25  

Caption

Jury service; exempts clerk of circuit court and circuit court clerk deputies.

Summary

HB2536 amends Virginia’s jury exemption statute to expressly include the elected clerk of any circuit court and the clerk’s deputies among those exempt from serving on juries in civil and criminal cases. The bill updates Code of Virginia § 8.01-341, which already lists categories of public officials and justice-system personnel who are not required to serve, such as the Governor, legislators, judges, sheriffs, police officers, jail officers, and licensed attorneys. In practical terms, the measure clarifies and codifies that circuit court clerks and their deputies are exempt from jury duty, aligning their status with other court and law-enforcement officials whose duties may conflict with jury service. The bill does not create a new jury system or alter juror qualifications generally; it narrows its effect to the exemption list in state law.

Impact

The bill amends § 8.01-341 of the Code of Virginia, expanding the statutory list of persons exempt from jury service to include elected circuit court clerks and circuit court clerk deputies. Its legal effect is limited to jury administration, but it directly affects circuit court clerks, their staff, and court clerks responsible for jury summons and exemption determinations. It also reinforces the broader policy in Virginia law of exempting certain public officials and justice-system personnel from jury duty because of their official responsibilities.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been broadly supported and noncontroversial. It moved through subcommittee, committee, and both chambers with unanimous or near-unanimous votes, including 8-0 in subcommittee, 22-0 in House committee, 96-0 in the House, 15-0 in Senate committee, 39-0 on Senate second reading, and 40-0 in the Senate. The voting history suggests general agreement that the exemption was appropriate and routine rather than politically divisive.

Contention

No significant opposition is reflected in the available record, and there are no committee transcripts indicating debate. The only potential point of policy concern is the scope of jury-duty exemptions: some observers could view adding another occupational category as further narrowing the jury pool, while supporters likely see it as a practical recognition of the clerks’ official duties and their role in the court system. However, the recorded votes show no visible contention among legislators.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.