Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB1901

Introduced
1/6/25  
Refer
1/6/25  
Report Pass
1/24/25  
Engrossed
1/29/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
2/12/25  
Enrolled
2/19/25  
Chaptered
3/21/25  

Caption

Virginia Sports Tourism Grant Program; established, report.

Summary

HB1901 establishes the Virginia Sports Tourism Grant Program within the Virginia Tourism Authority to help develop and attract sports tourism activities to the Commonwealth. The program is aimed at competitively bid youth, collegiate, and other sporting events that draw most participants from outside Virginia and are hosted at eligible venues or facilities in the state. Grants may be awarded only to in-state sports tourism activity sponsors such as convention and visitors bureaus, chambers of commerce, sports commissions, nonprofit sports support organizations, and political subdivisions. To receive a grant, an applicant must enter into a performance agreement with the Authority. That agreement must address how funds will be disbursed, how grant proceeds may be used, reporting duties, and repayment if performance obligations are not met. The Authority must also create guidelines and objective criteria for awarding grants, and those guidelines must require a matching contribution equal to the grant amount. The bill also requires annual reporting on awards and expenditures by November 1 each year.

Impact

The bill adds a new section, 2.2-2320.3, to the Code of Virginia and creates a new grant program administered by the Virginia Tourism Authority. It affects state tourism policy and local or regional entities that host or promote sporting events by making them eligible for state grant support, while also imposing performance, matching-fund, and reporting requirements. The bill further exempts the guideline-development process from the Administrative Process Act and requires any repayment of grant funds to be deposited into the state treasury.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have broad bipartisan support and little visible opposition. It advanced unanimously or near-unanimously through committee and Senate stages, and passed the House with only six no votes. The lack of recorded committee testimony suggests the measure was relatively noncontroversial, likely because it is framed as an economic development and tourism promotion initiative rather than a regulatory or tax change.

Contention

The main policy questions appear to be around program design rather than whether the program should exist. The bill requires a one-to-one matching contribution, performance agreements, and repayment obligations, which may have been intended to address concerns about accountability and public return on investment. Potential stakeholders with the most direct interest include local tourism authorities, sports commissions, venue operators, and hospitality businesses, while any concerns would likely center on how eligible events are defined, how grants are awarded, and whether state funds should be used to subsidize sports tourism competition among localities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.