Virginia 2023 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB1590

Introduced
1/6/23  
Refer
1/6/23  
Report Pass
1/23/23  
Engrossed
1/26/23  
Refer
1/30/23  
Report Pass
2/8/23  
Enrolled
2/16/23  
Chaptered
3/22/23  

Caption

Telephone, digital pager, or other device; causing to ring or signal with intent to annoy, penalty.

Impact

The legislative change brought forth by HB1590 is expected to enhance the integrity of emergency communication systems by holding individuals accountable for misuse of telecommunications devices. The amendment seeks to deter inappropriate usage that can distract emergency personnel or lead to unnecessary distress to others. By establishing clear penalties for such actions, the bill aims to protect the operational capabilities of emergency services during crucial moments.

Summary

House Bill 1590 is an amendment to existing legislation concerning the use of telecommunications devices in Virginia, particularly focusing on actions that could harass or annoy individuals, especially emergency personnel. This bill specifically lays down penalties for any individual who intentionally causes a telephone or digital pager to ring with the intent to annoy another person. It classifies this act as a Class 3 misdemeanor, but escalates to a Class 2 misdemeanor upon subsequent offenses. The bill is aimed at reducing frivolous disturbances that can impede communication, particularly for emergency services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1590 appears to be largely supportive among legislators, as evidenced by its passage through the Senate with unanimous voting (40 in favor, 0 against). Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary update to ensure public order and respect for emergency communications. However, there are concerns regarding potential overreach and the implications of criminalizing certain behaviors that could be deemed minor infractions.

Contention

While the bill has garnered general support, there are debates about the adequacy of adjudicating nuisance calls under criminal law as opposed to civil means. Opponents worry that the legislation could inadvertently criminalize innocuous actions, leading to unintended consequences for those who engage in honest miscommunication. Others raise concerns about the effectiveness of the penalties in genuinely deterring the disruptive behavior targeted by the bill, questioning whether adjusting existing civil penalties might suffice.

Companion Bills

VA SB1034

Same As Telephone, digital pager, or other device; causing to ring or signal with intent to annoy, penalty.

Previously Filed As

VA H3806

Driving while using wireless communication devices

VA SB23

Revises provisions related to the use of cellular telephones and other handheld wireless communications devices by minors while operating a motor vehicle. (BDR 43-251)

VA HB2263

Motor vehicles; making certain use of cellular telephones and electronic devices unlawful on certain stretches of road; penalty; municipal ordinances; effective date.

VA HB2263

Motor vehicles; making certain use of cellular telephones and electronic devices unlawful on certain stretches of road; penalty; municipal ordinances; effective date.

VA A2789

Clarifies that harassment made anonymously or otherwise through electronic communication devices constitutes a petty disorderly offense.

VA HB2792

Prohibiting the use of a mobile telephone while operating a motor vehicle in school or construction zones and providing penalties for violations thereof.

VA SB1298

Use of profane, threatening, etc., language over the telephone; repeated telephone contact, penalty.

VA SB324

Prohibiting the use of a mobile telephone while operating a motor vehicle in school or construction zones and providing penalties for violations thereof.

VA SB41

Revise a provision related to criminal invasions of privacy, prohibit the creation and distribution of digitally fabricated material of an identifiable individual, and provide penalties therefor.

VA HB1155

Signal jamming devices.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.