Joint Resolution Calling for an Executive Order on Federalism
Summary
SJR012 is a Utah Senate resolution that urges the President of the United States to issue a new executive order on federalism. The resolution argues that federalism is a core constitutional principle that protects the balance of power between the federal government and the states, and it cites Executive Order 12612 from the Reagan administration as a model. It calls for the new order to reaffirm federalism and to include self-enforcing mechanisms that would make federal agencies more accountable when writing regulations.
The resolution specifically asks for federal agencies to conduct federalism assessments during rulemaking, consult with state governments early in the regulatory process, publish detailed explanations when federal actions affect state authority, and create oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance. It also urges Congress to oversee federal agencies and asks that copies of the resolution be sent to federal leaders, Utah’s congressional delegation, and legislative leaders in other states to encourage similar action.
Impact
This bill does not change Utah statutes, appropriate money, or create new state regulatory requirements. Instead, it is a nonbinding legislative resolution expressing Utah’s position on federal-state relations and requesting federal executive action. Its practical effect is political and advocacy-oriented: it seeks to influence federal rulemaking practices and encourage broader support for stronger federalism protections, especially in how federal agencies interact with state governments.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment appears supportive of the resolution’s federalism message. The bill advanced through the Utah Senate with favorable committee and floor votes, suggesting substantial backing for its call to limit federal overreach and strengthen state sovereignty. The language of the resolution reflects a strong pro-state, anti-centralization viewpoint, and the voting history indicates the measure was generally well received, though not unanimously.
Contention
The main point of contention is the underlying policy view that federal agencies and federal regulation have encroached too far on state authority. Supporters emphasize constitutional balance, state sovereignty, and the need for enforceable federalism safeguards, while likely opponents would view the resolution as symbolic, ideologically driven, or an attempt to constrain federal regulatory authority. The recorded votes show some dissent in committee and on the floor, indicating that although the measure had broad support, there was not complete agreement on either the need for the resolution or the framing of federal-state conflict.