Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0370

Introduced
1/31/25  
Refer
2/6/25  
Report Pass
2/11/25  
Engrossed
2/21/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
3/5/25  

Caption

State Holiday Modifications

Summary

HB 370 modifies Utah’s legal holiday statute to make June 19, Juneteenth National Freedom Day, a fixed state holiday rather than a holiday that shifts to the nearest Monday or Friday depending on the day of the week. The bill keeps Juneteenth in the list of legal holidays and aligns it with the same weekend-observance rules used for other Utah holidays, so if June 19 falls on a Saturday or Sunday it is observed on the preceding Friday or following Monday, respectively. The bill also makes a related change to Utah’s parent-time laws so that Juneteenth is specifically incorporated into holiday custody schedules. In the family-law sections, the bill revises the holiday tables for both the minimum parent-time schedule for children ages five to 18 and the minimum schedule for children under five. It sets out detailed Juneteenth parenting-time rules, including how the holiday is allocated between parents in odd and even years and how it interacts with Father’s Day when the dates overlap. The bill also updates the timing of other holiday periods in the parent-time tables to reflect the new Juneteenth structure and makes corresponding conforming changes across the custody schedules. The bill has no appropriation and is set to take effect on January 1, 2026. Its legal impact is mainly on Utah Code sections governing state holidays and court-ordered parent-time, affecting state agencies, employers, and families subject to custody orders. By changing Juneteenth from a movable observance to a fixed-date holiday in state law, it standardizes holiday recognition and reduces ambiguity in scheduling. Overall sentiment appears generally favorable in the House, where the bill received unanimous committee support and passed the House on third reading by a wide margin. The Senate committee vote, however, shows some resistance or at least lack of consensus, as a motion to recommend the bill failed 1-2. No committee transcripts were provided, so the record shows support in the House but a more divided reception in the Senate. The main point of contention appears to be the detailed treatment of Juneteenth in the parent-time schedule, especially how it interacts with Father’s Day and the exact timing of holiday exchanges. Because the bill changes both holiday recognition and custody scheduling, debate likely centers on whether the new fixed-date observance and revised parenting-time rules are the best way to balance consistency in state holidays with fairness in family court orders.

Impact

The bill amends Utah Code sections 63G-1-301, 81-9-302, 81-9-303, and 81-9-304. It changes Juneteenth National Freedom Day to a fixed legal holiday on June 19, with standard weekend observance rules for Saturday and Sunday occurrences, and updates the statutory parent-time holiday schedules to include revised Juneteenth provisions for both older and younger children. These changes affect state holiday administration and court-ordered custody/visitation schedules, but do not appropriate funds.

Sentiment

The bill appears broadly supported in the House, with unanimous committee votes and a strong floor passage, suggesting general agreement with recognizing Juneteenth as a fixed state holiday and updating related family-law schedules. The Senate committee result was less favorable, indicating some hesitation or disagreement at that stage. No transcript discussion is available, so the record only shows the voting pattern rather than specific arguments.

Contention

The most notable contention is the parent-time language, particularly the detailed holiday allocation for Juneteenth and its interaction with Father’s Day, which can create overlapping or competing holiday claims in custody orders. Another likely point of debate is the policy choice to make Juneteenth a fixed-date holiday in state law while also adjusting the broader holiday-observance framework. The Senate committee’s failed motion to recommend suggests at least some concern, though the available record does not identify which members or arguments drove the opposition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.