Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0024

Introduced
1/21/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
1/30/25  
Engrossed
2/6/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
2/18/25  
Enrolled
3/3/25  

Caption

Limitations on Liability Amendments

Summary

HB 24 amends Utah’s repeal-date statute to extend the sunset for Section 78B-4-518, which limits an employer’s liability for an employee who has been convicted of an offense. The bill does not create a new liability rule; instead, it keeps the existing employer-liability limitation in place for four additional years by changing the repeal date from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2029. The measure is narrow and technical in scope. It affects Title 78B, Chapter 4, Part 5 of the Utah Code by preserving a provision that shields employers from certain liability claims tied to an employee’s criminal conviction. The bill contains no appropriation and takes effect on May 7, 2025.

Impact

HB 24 extends the life of an existing statutory protection for employers, delaying the automatic repeal of Section 78B-4-518 until July 1, 2029. As a result, employers in Utah continue to benefit from the liability limitation for employee convictions, and any parties relying on the prior sunset date will see the provision remain operative for four more years. The bill amends only the state’s repeal-date section in Title 63I and does not otherwise alter the underlying liability standard.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been broadly supported and noncontroversial. It passed the House and Senate with unanimous committee recommendations and unanimous floor votes in both chambers, suggesting general agreement that the existing employer-liability limitation should remain in effect. The absence of recorded opposition or debate indicates a technical extension with little visible partisan or policy conflict.

Contention

There is little evidence of substantive contention in the available record. The only policy question implicit in the bill is whether the employer-liability limitation should continue beyond its original sunset date, but the unanimous votes suggest that lawmakers were comfortable extending it. Because no committee transcripts are available, no specific objections from employers, employee advocates, or criminal-justice stakeholders are documented in the provided materials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.