A bill to prohibit funds made available to the Department of Justice from being used to make a personal payment to the President in connection with a claim that is subject to the Federal Tort Claims Act, whether in the form of a settlement or any other payment from the Judgment Fund for the personal benefit of the President.
Summary
SB4124 would bar funds made available to the Department of Justice from being used to approve or facilitate any claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act that results in a personal payment to the President. The prohibition applies whether the payment comes through a settlement or through the federal Judgment Fund, and it is framed to prevent any payment for the President’s personal benefit in connection with a covered tort claim.
The bill is narrowly focused on federal appropriations and payment authority rather than changing the underlying Federal Tort Claims Act itself. By restricting DOJ funding, it would limit the executive branch’s ability to process or support certain tort-related payments involving the President, and it would also affect use of the Judgment Fund under title 31 for those claims. In practical terms, it would create a funding restriction that could block or delay any such personal recovery by the President from a tort claim covered by the FTCA.
Impact
If enacted, SB4124 would amend the practical operation of federal claims payment by prohibiting DOJ from using appropriated funds to approve or facilitate FTCA claims that result in personal payments to the President. It would not rewrite the FTCA’s liability rules, but it would constrain how the Department of Justice and related federal payment mechanisms can be used in cases involving the President’s personal benefit, including settlements and Judgment Fund disbursements.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no documented floor or committee sentiment in the materials supplied. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears to be a targeted restriction intended to prevent a specific category of payment to the President, suggesting a cautious or adversarial posture toward such payments rather than a broad policy overhaul.
Contention
The main point of contention would likely be whether Congress should use appropriations restrictions to block personal payments to the President in tort cases, and whether the bill is a necessary safeguard or an overbroad intrusion into claims administration. Potential supporters would emphasize preventing misuse of federal funds and avoiding personal financial benefit to the President, while potential opponents could argue that it interferes with lawful claims processing, creates unequal treatment for the President, or raises separation-of-powers concerns. No specific member positions or recorded disagreements were included in the provided history.
To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit Presidents and Vice Presidents from receiving damages payments from the United States, and for other purposes.
Withholding Investments from Lawless Litigators In States Act or the WILLIS ActThis bill prohibits federal funds from being awarded or otherwise made available to the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office in Georgia. The bill also (1) rescinds any unobligated funds that were allocated for or otherwise made available to the office, and (2) directs the Department of Justice to require the office to reimburse the federal government for all funds that were expended for the office after January 1, 2021.
Relating to directing payment, after approval, of certain miscellaneous claims and judgments against the state out of funds designated by this Act; making appropriations.
Accountability for Lawless Violence In our Neighborhoods Act or the ALVIN ActThis bill prohibits federal funds from being awarded or otherwise made available to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in New York. The bill also (1) rescinds any unobligated funds that were allocated for or otherwise made available to the office, and (2) directs the Department of Justice to require the office to reimburse the federal government for all funds that were expended for the office after January 1, 2022.
Relates to the use of funds and payments from the IOLA fund; provides that funds and payments shall not be used for any other purpose other than as stated in section 97-v of the state finance law.
Relating to directing payment, after approval, of certain miscellaneous claims and judgments against the state out of funds designated by this Act; making appropriations.
To prohibit funds made available to the Department of Health and Human Services by previous Appropriations Acts from being used for any activity that makes Medicare Advantage the default under the Medicare program.
Providing for the withholding of Commonwealth payments to the Federal Government; perfecting liens on Federal property; establishing a civil cause of action; and prohibiting the Commonwealth from sharing data with the Federal Government that contains personally identifiable information.