A bill to reinforce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 by establishing a limitations period of 10 years for antibribery offenses, and for other purposes.
Summary
SB4029 would amend federal law to create a 10-year statute of limitations for certain foreign bribery offenses covered by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and related provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. Specifically, it would apply to antibribery offenses under Exchange Act section 30A and FCPA sections 104 and 104A, allowing prosecutors up to 10 years after the offense to bring an indictment or information.
The bill also includes two important timing provisions. First, it would not apply retroactively to offenses committed within the five years before enactment, limiting its reach to older conduct. Second, it would sunset eight years after enactment, meaning the extended limitations period would be temporary unless Congress renews it.
Impact
The bill would directly affect federal criminal enforcement of foreign bribery laws by extending the time prosecutors have to investigate and charge FCPA antibribery cases. It would override the general five-year federal limitations period in 18 U.S.C. 3282(a) for the covered offenses, giving the Department of Justice and other enforcement authorities more time to pursue complex international corruption cases. Companies, executives, and other persons subject to the FCPA would face a longer period of potential liability, while the bill’s delayed applicability and sunset would limit its immediate and long-term scope.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and available context, the measure appears to be framed as a strengthening of anti-corruption enforcement, with support from a group of Democratic senators led by Sen. Warren and several other co-sponsors. There is no recorded committee debate or vote history in the provided materials, so no formal opposition or bipartisan sentiment can be identified from the record here. Overall, the bill’s stated purpose suggests a pro-enforcement, anti-corruption posture.
Contention
The main policy issue is whether extending the limitations period is necessary and appropriate for FCPA cases, which often involve complex, cross-border investigations that can take years to develop. Supporters are likely to argue that a 10-year period better matches the difficulty of uncovering foreign bribery schemes, while potential critics may worry about stale prosecutions, increased compliance exposure for businesses, and the temporary but still significant expansion of federal enforcement authority. The bill’s five-year lookback exclusion and eight-year sunset appear designed to moderate those concerns, but no specific objections are documented in the provided record.
A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through May 21, 2026, and for other purposes.
To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through April 20, 2029, and for other purposes.
A bill to require a report on the use of artificial intelligence with respect to access to unminimized information collected pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.
To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through October 20, 2027, and for other purposes.