US Federal House Bill HR148

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/25
• Refer: 2/21/25

Caption

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) and the harmful conflation of China's "One China Principle" and the United States "One China Policy".

Summary

H. Res. 148 is a House resolution expressing the sense of the House on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 and on the distinction between China’s “One China Principle” and the United States’ “One China Policy.” The resolution states that UNGA Resolution 2758, adopted in 1971, resolved only the question of which government would occupy China’s seat at the United Nations and did not decide Taiwan’s political status. It argues that the People’s Republic of China has misused the resolution to support claims that Taiwan is part of China and to pressure other countries and international organizations to limit Taiwan’s participation. The resolution reaffirms the U.S. position that it acknowledges the PRC’s claim but does not take a position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, and it reiterates support for a peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues. It also cites the Six Assurances, supports Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations, and encourages the U.S. government and partners to counter what it describes as false PRC narratives about Resolution 2758. The measure further supports Taiwan’s diplomatic relationships and access to international venues, including United Nations grounds, without requiring PRC-issued identification. In practical terms, the bill does not amend the U.S. Code or create new regulatory requirements; it is a nonbinding House resolution that expresses congressional policy views and urges diplomatic support for Taiwan. Its effect would be political and diplomatic rather than statutory, but it could influence U.S. messaging, foreign policy coordination, and congressional support for Taiwan’s international space. The overall sentiment reflected in the text is strongly supportive of Taiwan and critical of the PRC’s use of Resolution 2758. The resolution presents China’s actions as coercive, misleading, and aimed at isolating Taiwan internationally. Because there are no recorded committee transcripts or votes in the provided material, there is no documented floor or committee debate to show opposition, but the main point of contention inherent in the measure is the interpretation of Resolution 2758 and whether it has any bearing on Taiwan’s status. Supporters of the resolution reject that connection, while the PRC’s position is that it does.

Impact

This resolution would not change statutory law or impose legal obligations; it is a statement of the House’s position on U.N. Resolution 2758, Taiwan, and U.S. China policy. Its practical impact is to reaffirm existing U.S. policy language, encourage support for Taiwan’s participation in international organizations, and direct diplomatic attention toward countering PRC claims and pressure campaigns. It may affect how U.S. officials frame Taiwan-related issues in international forums and how Congress signals support for Taiwan’s allies and partners.

Sentiment

The bill’s tone is strongly pro-Taiwan and critical of the PRC. The resolution frames China’s interpretation of UNGA Resolution 2758 as misleading and coercive, and it emphasizes support for Taiwan’s international participation and diplomatic relationships. No committee discussion or vote record was provided, so there is no evidence of recorded opposition or amendment activity in the supplied materials.

Contention

The central point of contention is the meaning of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 and whether it can be used to support claims about Taiwan’s sovereignty. The resolution rejects the PRC’s view that 2758 endorses the “One China Principle,” while the PRC’s position is that it does. Related disputes include Taiwan’s access to international organizations, the use of PRC-issued identification for entry to U.N. facilities, and whether countries should maintain or expand official or unofficial ties with Taiwan despite PRC pressure.