Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".
Summary
H.J. Res. 30 is a congressional disapproval resolution under the Congressional Review Act. It would nullify an Environmental Protection Agency rule titled “Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020,” published at 89 Fed. Reg. 82682 (Oct. 11, 2024). If enacted, the resolution would make that EPA rule have no force or effect.
The underlying EPA rule concerns the management and phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and related substitutes, which are used in refrigeration, air conditioning, aerosols, and other industrial applications. This joint resolution does not create a new regulatory program; instead, it seeks to overturn an existing federal regulation and prevent its implementation.
Impact
The bill would directly affect federal environmental regulation by disapproving the EPA’s HFC rule under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code. If adopted, it would invalidate the rule and block the agency from enforcing the specific phasedown and management requirements contained in that regulation. The practical effect would be to alter compliance obligations for manufacturers, importers, and users of HFCs and substitute refrigerants, while leaving the broader American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 in place.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and available context, the measure appears to be a deregulatory effort aimed at limiting EPA authority over refrigerants and climate-related chemical controls. The resolution was introduced by Republican members and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, with no recorded committee debate or votes provided in the available materials. The overall sentiment is therefore best characterized as supportive among sponsors and likely skeptical of the EPA rule, though the broader chamber position is not shown in the record provided.
Contention
The main point of contention is whether the EPA should be allowed to implement the HFC phasedown rule under the AIM Act. Supporters of the resolution are likely to argue that the rule is overly burdensome or exceeds appropriate regulatory limits, while opponents would likely view it as an important climate and environmental protection measure because HFCs are potent greenhouse gases. The dispute centers on federal regulatory authority, industry compliance costs, and the balance between environmental policy and economic impacts on affected businesses.
Identical bill
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".
Identical bill
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".