Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment.
Summary
H.J.Res. 130 is a Congressional Review Act joint resolution that disapproves a Bureau of Land Management rule tied to the Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. If enacted, the resolution nullifies the BLM action and prevents the underlying land-use plan amendment from taking effect as a federal rule.
The measure is a targeted federal land-management disapproval rather than a broad policy rewrite. Its practical effect is to remove legal force from the BLM’s Buffalo Field Office planning decision, which would affect how federal lands in the relevant area are managed, including resource development, conservation, grazing, access, and other land-use decisions governed by the plan amendment.
Impact
The resolution operates under chapter 8 of title 5, the Congressional Review Act, and would bar the BLM rule from having force or effect. Because the bill became Public Law No. 119-51, it changed the legal status of the Buffalo Field Office resource management plan amendment by invalidating the agency action at the federal level. The affected parties include the Bureau of Land Management, local land users, energy and mineral interests, ranchers, conservation stakeholders, and state and local governments with interests in federal land management in the Buffalo area.
Sentiment
The voting history suggests the bill was politically contentious but ultimately successful. The House passed the resolution by a narrow margin, 213-211, and the Senate approved it 51-43, indicating support from a majority but not broad bipartisan consensus. The final enactment into law shows that proponents were able to secure enough votes to overturn the BLM rule despite opposition.
Contention
The main point of contention is the underlying BLM land-use plan amendment itself: supporters of the resolution likely viewed the rule as an overreach or an undesirable management direction, while opponents likely favored leaving the agency’s planning decision in place. The close votes indicate disagreement over federal land management policy, the proper scope of BLM authority, and the balance between development, conservation, and local control. No committee transcript is available, so the specific arguments are not detailed in the record provided.
Same As
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Related
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 80) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 130) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 131) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision''; providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 58) denouncing the horrors of socialism; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1949) to repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3109) to require the Secretary of Energy to direct the National Petroleum Council to issue a report with respect to petrochemical refineries in the United States, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5107) to repeal the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 enacted by the District of Columbia Council; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5214) to require mandatory pretrial and post conviction detention for crimes of violence and dangerous crimes and require mandatory cash bail for certain offenses that pose a threat to public safety or order in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.