Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit voting in Federal, State, or local elections by individuals who are not citizens of the United States.
Summary
H.J. Res. 107 proposes a constitutional amendment that would bar non-citizens of the United States from voting in any election for public office at the federal, state, or local level. The amendment would also prohibit non-citizens from voting on ballot initiatives or referendums. If adopted and ratified, it would become part of the U.S. Constitution and apply nationwide.
The resolution includes an enforcement clause giving Congress authority to pass implementing legislation. As a proposed constitutional amendment, it would not change existing law on its own unless approved by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states within seven years of submission.
Impact
If enacted through the constitutional amendment process, the resolution would supersede any state or local laws that currently allow non-citizen voting in limited contexts and would establish a uniform national rule limiting voting to U.S. citizens. It would affect federal, state, and local election administration, as well as ballot measure participation, and would likely require conforming legislation and voter eligibility verification procedures if ratified.
Sentiment
No committee discussion or recorded votes are provided, so there is no direct evidence of bipartisan support or opposition in the available record. Based on the text alone, the measure appears to reflect a restrictive approach to voter eligibility and is framed as a citizenship-based voting rule rather than an election administration adjustment. The bill was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary and has not advanced further in the provided materials.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely whether non-citizen voting should be categorically prohibited in all elections and ballot measures, including local contests and referendums. Supporters would likely argue the proposal protects the integrity of elections and reserves voting to citizens, while opponents may view it as unnecessary, overly broad, or aimed at a limited issue that could affect local participation rules. No specific objections or endorsements are recorded in the provided transcripts or vote history.