HB9 would prohibit the use of federal funds for the HHS Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force, a task force announced by the Secretary of Health and Human Services on January 21, 2022. The bill also bars federal funding for any successor or substantially similar task force. Its short title, the “No Pro-Abortion Task Force Act,” signals that the measure is intended to end federal support for an HHS initiative focused on reproductive healthcare access.
In practical terms, the bill would not directly rewrite broader healthcare law, but it would restrict how HHS may spend appropriated funds and would eliminate federal support for this specific task force or any comparable body. If enacted, it would affect the Department of Health and Human Services and any related advisory or coordination efforts on reproductive healthcare access, particularly those tied to abortion-related policy or services.
The available record shows no committee transcript and no recorded votes, so there is no documented floor debate or formal vote history to gauge broader legislative sentiment. Based on the bill text alone, the measure reflects opposition to the Biden-era HHS task force and a desire to defund federal reproductive-health coordination efforts.
The main point of contention is likely the underlying policy purpose of the task force itself: supporters of the bill appear to view it as a pro-abortion federal initiative, while opponents would likely argue that it supports access to reproductive healthcare and information. Because the bill targets both the existing task force and any successor or substantially similar entity, the dispute is not only over one program but also over whether HHS should be able to maintain any comparable federal reproductive-health access initiative.
Impact
The bill would amend federal spending practice by prohibiting the use of federal funds for the HHS Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force and any successor or substantially similar task force. It would primarily affect the Department of Health and Human Services and any federal reproductive-health coordination efforts, but it would not itself create new healthcare benefits or directly change substantive abortion or healthcare statutes.
Sentiment
There is no recorded committee discussion or vote history in the provided materials, so formal sentiment cannot be measured from legislative proceedings. The bill text itself indicates a clearly oppositional stance toward the HHS task force, framing it as a “No Pro-Abortion Task Force Act,” which suggests support from anti-abortion lawmakers and likely opposition from lawmakers who favor reproductive healthcare access initiatives.
Contention
The central controversy is whether the HHS Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force is an appropriate federal effort to support reproductive healthcare access or an improper pro-abortion policy vehicle. Supporters of the bill likely argue that federal funds should not support abortion-related advocacy or coordination, while opponents would likely contend that the task force serves legitimate public-health and access functions. The bill’s broad language covering any “successor or substantially similar” task force also suggests concern about agencies reconstituting the same policy effort under a different name.
No Pro-Abortion Task Force Act This bill prohibits federal funding of the Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force. The Department of Health and Human Services launched the task force on January 21, 2022, to identify and coordinate departmental activities related to accessing sexual and reproductive health care.
Recognizing that article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution explicitly reserves to the States the sovereign power to repel an invasion and defend their citizenry from the overwhelming and "imminent danger" posed by paramilitary, narco-terrorist cartels, terrorists and criminal actors who seized control of our southern border.
Yosemite National Park Equal Access and Fairness ActThis bill modifies the Raker Act, which allowed San Francisco to dam the Hetch Hetchy Valley within Yosemite National Park, to (1) increase the annual rent San Francisco pays to the National Park Service (NPS), and (2) direct the NPS to expand public access to the reservoir and lake created by the dam.Specifically, the bill increases rent paid by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission for the use of the park from $30,000 to $2 million per year. That amount must be adjusted annually to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The commission may not recoup such sums from wholesale water or power customers. The bill allows collected rent to be used by the Department of the Interior for wildfire mitigation activities in the park and other national parks in California.The bill also requires the NPS to administer the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir and Lake Eleanor Basin areas for public recreation, benefit, and use in a manner that will preserve scenic, historic, scientific, or otherwise important features.