Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act
Summary
HB7287, titled the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act, would direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study for a proposed project to expand the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System. The study would examine the practicality of supplying municipal, rural, and industrial water to increase the system’s capacity and service area in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota.
The bill requires the Secretary to work with the non-Federal project entity, identified as Lewis and Clark Regional Water System, Inc. or a nonprofit successor, and to consult with relevant federal, state, tribal, regional, and local authorities. After completing the study, the Secretary must produce a feasibility report recommending whether the project should be authorized for construction and identifying an appropriate non-Federal cost share, which must be at least 25 percent of total construction costs and based on the ability to pay construction, operations, maintenance, and replacement costs. The report and supporting documents must be submitted to congressional committees and made publicly available.
Impact
The bill does not itself authorize construction of the water system expansion, but it would create a federal process for evaluating whether such a project should move forward. It would authorize up to $10 million for the feasibility study, cap the federal share of study costs at 50 percent, and set a 10-year expiration on the authority. If enacted, it would affect the Department of the Interior, the House Committee on Natural Resources, the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the non-Federal project entity involved in the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System expansion.
Sentiment
The available context suggests the bill is generally supportive and technical in nature, focused on advancing a regional water infrastructure proposal rather than debating broader policy changes. Because there are no recorded votes or committee transcript excerpts, there is no evidence of formal opposition or partisan division in the provided materials. The bill appears to have been introduced and then held in subcommittee hearings, indicating that it was under review rather than having advanced through a recorded floor vote.
Contention
The main points of potential contention are likely to be cost, federal involvement, and the required non-Federal share. The bill sets a minimum 25 percent non-Federal contribution for construction and limits federal study funding to 50 percent, which may be important to local project sponsors and state or regional partners. Another possible issue is whether the proposed expansion is sufficiently justified to warrant federal study and eventual authorization, but no specific objections are documented in the provided record.
Supporting congressional authorization for, and federal participation in, major rural water supply projects identified by the South Dakota Association of Rural Water Systems.
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a feasibility study on a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam, and for other purposes.
Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (EN INCREASE SD EX See Note)
A bill for an act providing for certain business entities acting under the jurisdiction of the secretary of state by providing for the removal of information from a filing based on a sworn affidavit and administrative dissolution based on the response to interrogatories.(See HF 2678.)