US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB6012

Introduced
 
Introduced
11/10/25  
Refer
11/10/25  

Caption

FARE Act

Impact

By implementing these guidelines, HB6012 is intended to maintain operational consistency for airlines and safeguard the rights of passengers. Opponents of the bill, however, might raise concerns about public safety implications, particularly in scenarios where government oversight and funding are absent. The bill aims to balance the interests of commercial airlines with the need for regulatory compliance, particularly during emergency situations caused by funding lapses. Overall, the expectation is that the air travel industry would remain resilient and less prone to disruptions arising from funding issues.

Summary

House Bill 6012, known as the 'Fair Aviation in Restrictions and Emergencies Act' or the 'FARE Act', aims to establish a clear guideline on the restriction of commercial flights during lapses in federal appropriations. Specifically, the bill prohibits the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) from temporarily reducing or banning commercial flights in navigable airspace unless all private aircraft flights are similarly restricted in the same geographical area. This legislative proposal seeks to ensure that commercial air travel remains accessible even when government funding is disrupted, arguing that such restrictions can adversely affect the general populace relying on commercial air services for their travel needs.

Contention

The FARE Act has sparked debate over the priorities of air traffic management during crises. While supporters assert that the legislation protects the economic stability of airlines and convenience for travelers, critics could argue that the bill undermines safety protocols by requiring commercial flights to continue operating under potential situations where FAA oversight might be compromised. The definition of what constitutes a lapse in appropriations also plays a key role in this discussion, as it has the potential to create confusion regarding the enforcement of flight restrictions. Thus, the contention revolves around balancing public safety, economic considerations, and the operational capability of the FAA.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

US H4679

South Carolina Drone Regulation and Public Safety Act

US SB1249

Drone Integration and Zoning Act

US SB87

AN ACT relating to aviation.

US AB2113

An act to add Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 21750) to Division 9 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to aviation.

US HB0191

Airport Land Use Amendments

US HB7613

ALERT Act Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act of 2026

US HB4834

Aeronautics: other; aeronautics code; revise. Amends title & secs. 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 26, 27, 33, 34, 35, 51, 52, 53, 55, 76, 76a, 77, 80b, 80e, 82, 86, 109 & 155 of 1945 PA 327 (MCL 259.2 et seq.); adds sec. 89c & repeals sec. 36 of 1945 PA 327 (MCL 259.36). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4835'25

US SB0172

Airport and Air Amendments

US SB2503

ROTOR Act Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight Reform Act

US HB3134

Relating to advanced air mobility.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.