US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB5792

Introduced
 
Introduced
10/17/25  

Caption

Government Shutdown Salary Suspension Act

Summary

HB5792, the Government Shutdown Salary Suspension Act, would suspend the immediate payment of salaries to Members of Congress, the President, and the Vice President during any period when a federal government shutdown is in effect. Instead of being paid during the shutdown, the affected salaries would be calculated daily and placed into escrow by the relevant payroll administrators. The withheld amounts would then be released only after the shutdown ends, or, in some cases, at the end of the relevant Congress or presidential term. The bill applies both to the 119th Congress specifically and to future Congresses and presidential terms. It defines a government shutdown as a lapse in appropriations caused by the failure to enact a regular appropriations bill or continuing resolution. The measure also directs the Secretary of the Treasury and the Office of Personnel Management, along with House and Senate payroll officials, to carry out the escrow and withholding procedures, including normal tax withholding and remittance rules. In practical terms, the bill would not permanently reduce compensation for federal elected officials, but it would delay payment during shutdowns. It is designed to ensure that lawmakers and top executive officials experience the financial consequences of a shutdown alongside other federal workers and the public, while avoiding a constitutional issue by preserving the eventual payment of withheld salary amounts. The general sentiment reflected by the bill’s introduction is punitive toward shutdowns and aimed at accountability, with the sponsors signaling support for tying elected officials’ pay to the functioning of government. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no documented opposition or support in the available record beyond the bill’s filing and referral. The main point of contention likely concerns whether withholding pay is an effective or constitutional way to pressure Congress and the executive branch during budget impasses. The bill explicitly addresses the Twenty-Seventh Amendment by placing pay in escrow rather than canceling it, suggesting that constitutional compliance is a central issue. Another likely concern is whether the measure would meaningfully deter shutdowns or simply create an administrative mechanism without changing underlying budget politics.

Impact

The bill would amend federal compensation administration rules for Members of Congress, the President, and the Vice President during shutdowns by requiring escrow treatment of salary payments. It would affect the payroll processes of the House, Senate, and executive branch personnel systems, and it would create a statutory definition of when a government shutdown is deemed to exist for purposes of the Act. Existing salary statutes would remain in place, but payment timing would be altered during appropriations lapses.

Sentiment

The available record suggests a reform-minded, accountability-focused sentiment behind the bill, with the sponsors proposing that elected officials should not receive ordinary salary payments while the government is shut down. No committee debate or vote history is provided, so there is no evidence of broader bipartisan support or organized opposition in the materials supplied. The bill’s structure also indicates an effort to avoid constitutional objections by delaying rather than canceling compensation.

Contention

The most notable contention is likely constitutional and practical: critics may question whether Congress can condition or delay compensation in this way, even with escrow and end-of-term release provisions, while supporters would argue the bill preserves constitutional requirements by not permanently reducing pay. A second point of contention is policy effectiveness, since the measure may be seen either as a meaningful deterrent to shutdowns or as a symbolic gesture that does not address the causes of appropriations deadlock. Administrative complexity for payroll offices and the executive branch could also be raised as an issue.

Companion Bills

US HB5802

Related MAGA Act

Previously Filed As

US SB1077

CalFresh: federal government shutdowns.

US HB5870

Prevent Government Shutdowns Act

US HB5542

End Government Shutdowns Act

US HB5130

Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025

US SB2721

Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025

US SB4632

Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2026

US SB3057

Withhold Member Pay During Shutdowns Act

US HB5891

Withhold Member Pay During Shutdowns Act

US HB5874

Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act

US HB1973

No Pay for Congress During Default or Shutdown Act

Similar Bills

US SB1879

Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act

US SB3201

Good Government Act of 2025

US HB224

Inaction Has Consequences Act This bill withholds the salaries of Members of a chamber of Congress that has not passed each of the annual appropriations bills before the beginning of the fiscal year, beginning with FY2024. Salaries are released on the earlier of (1) the date on which the chamber of Congress passes the bills, or (2) the last day of the Congress.

US HB209

Inaction Has Consequences Act

US HB1908

End Congressional Stock Trading Act

US SB45

Balanced Budget Accountability Act

US HB157

Citizen Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform of Congress Act or the CLEAN Congress Act This bill (1) requires bills, orders, resolutions, or votes submitted by Congress to the President to include only one subject that is clearly and descriptively expressed in the measure's title; and (2) makes ineffective any provision of law that excludes its application to a Member of Congress or to an employee in a Member's office.

US HB155

Citizen Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform of Congress Act or the CLEAN Congress Act This bill (1) requires bills, orders, resolutions, or votes submitted by Congress to the President to include only one subject that is clearly and descriptively expressed in the measure's title; and (2) makes ineffective any provision of law that excludes its application to a Member of Congress or to an employee in a Member's office.