US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB5525

Introduced
3/18/26  
Introduced
9/19/25  
Refer
9/19/25  

Caption

Stop DC CAMERA Act

Summary

HB5525, titled the Stop DC CAMERA Act, would repeal two District of Columbia authorities related to traffic regulation and enforcement. First, it would eliminate the District’s authority to use automated traffic enforcement systems, which includes camera-based enforcement for traffic violations. Second, it would repeal the District’s authority to erect signage prohibiting certain right turns at red traffic signals, thereby removing the legal basis for those restrictions in D.C. law. The bill is narrowly focused on District of Columbia traffic policy and would amend the D.C. Code by repealing Section 9e of the District of Columbia Traffic Act of 1925 and Title IX of the Fiscal Year 1997 Budget Support Act of 1996. If enacted, it would reduce the District’s ability to use automated enforcement tools and to regulate right turns on red through signage, affecting local traffic management, enforcement practices, and drivers in the District.

Impact

The bill would directly alter the District of Columbia Code by repealing statutory provisions that authorize automated traffic enforcement and certain right-turn-on-red restrictions. This would remove legal authority for D.C. to deploy camera-based traffic enforcement systems and to post signs banning specific right turns at red lights, shifting traffic control practices in the District and potentially affecting enforcement revenue, roadway safety measures, and driver compliance obligations.

Sentiment

The available legislative history suggests the bill moved forward in committee but with a close and divided vote, as it was ordered to be reported amended by a 21-19 margin. That narrow vote indicates mixed sentiment and partisan or policy disagreement rather than broad consensus. The bill’s framing as a restoration of autonomy suggests supporters view it as limiting overreach, while the underlying policy change implies opponents likely see it as weakening traffic safety enforcement.

Contention

The main point of contention is whether automated traffic enforcement and right-turn restrictions at red lights improve safety or represent excessive government enforcement. Supporters appear to favor repealing camera enforcement and related signage authority as a matter of limiting enforcement practices in the District, while opponents likely argue that these tools are important for traffic safety, compliance, and reducing dangerous driving. The close committee vote reflects that the issue is politically and policy-wise divisive.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.