US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB5523

Introduced
 
Introduced
9/19/25  
Refer
9/19/25  

Caption

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act of 2025

Summary

HB5523, the Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act of 2025, would amend federal aviation law to raise the mandatory retirement age for pilots in multicrew commercial airline operations from 65 to 67. The bill updates 49 U.S.C. section 44729 and directs conforming changes to FAA regulations so that pilots in covered Part 121 operations may continue flying until age 67, including a limited retroactive provision allowing pilots already over 65 on the date of enactment to return to service until they reach 67. The bill also preserves and clarifies several related rules. It would keep the existing first-class medical certificate requirement for pilots age 60 and older, prohibit age-based differences in medical standards unless the FAA later finds stronger safety measures are needed based on new data or studies, and require FAA-approved training and qualification programs to continue. It further requires the FAA to report to Congress within 180 days on whether the age limit should be increased further.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would directly change federal aviation age standards for airline pilots and would require the FAA to conform its regulations to the new 67-year retirement age. It would affect commercial air carriers, pilots in Part 121 multicrew operations, collective bargaining agreements, benefit plans, and employment-related disputes by providing liability protection for actions taken in compliance with the new law. The bill would also preserve FAA authority over medical certification and safety oversight while mandating a congressional report on possible future age increases.

Sentiment

The available context suggests the bill is framed positively by its sponsor as a way to retain experienced pilots and expand the pool of qualified aviators. The bill’s title and structure emphasize safety safeguards alongside the age increase, indicating an effort to present the change as a measured adjustment rather than a wholesale relaxation of standards. No vote record or committee transcript is provided, so there is no documented committee or floor sentiment beyond the bill’s introduction and referral.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the balance between pilot experience and aviation safety. Supporters would favor allowing healthy, experienced pilots to remain in service longer, while critics may worry that raising the retirement age could increase safety risks or reduce opportunities for younger pilots. Additional potential friction points include the retroactive return-to-service provision, the interaction with union agreements and benefit plans, and whether the FAA should retain discretion to impose stricter medical standards if future evidence warrants it.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.