US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB4591

Introduced
 
Introduced
7/22/25  

Caption

Habitat Enhancement Now Act

Summary

HB4591, titled the Habitat Enhancement Now Act, would direct the Secretary of the Interior to create two competitive grant programs aimed at improving migratory waterfowl populations. One program would fund the placement, construction, and maintenance of “hen houses” in the prairie pothole region to improve nesting success. The other would fund breeding habitat projects in California, including establishing nesting cover, creating brood ponds, and providing incentives to willing landowners to carry out those activities on their land. The bill includes congressional findings explaining that waterfowl populations depend heavily on wetland and habitat conservation, that declining nest success is a major threat to duck populations, and that relatively modest management investments can improve production. It defines eligible applicants broadly to include state, local, and Tribal governments, nonprofits, and individuals, and it requires the Secretary to establish both grant programs within 180 days of enactment. The bill would amend federal wildlife conservation practice primarily through discretionary grant-making rather than regulatory mandates. It would authorize $3.5 million annually for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030 for the hen house program and another $3.5 million annually for the California breeding habitat program, drawn from the Department of the Interior’s Departmental Operations account. The practical effect would be to channel federal funds toward targeted habitat enhancement and nesting-support projects for ducks and other migratory waterfowl. General sentiment in the available record appears supportive and noncontroversial, but limited. The bill was introduced by a bipartisan group of House members and referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources, with no recorded votes or committee debate provided. The framing of the bill emphasizes conservation, cost-effectiveness, and support for private landowners, suggesting an effort to appeal to wildlife managers, agricultural interests, and habitat conservation advocates. The main point of potential contention is likely to be the use of federal funds for species-specific habitat interventions, particularly the allocation of money to projects in California and the reliance on incentives for private landowners. Some stakeholders could question whether the grant programs are the best use of Interior Department funds or whether the bill favors certain regions or management techniques over broader habitat restoration efforts. However, no explicit opposition is reflected in the materials provided.

Impact

HB4591 would create new federal grant authorities within the Department of the Interior and direct annual funding from the Departmental Operations account for two waterfowl habitat programs. It would not appear to change existing environmental permitting or land-use law directly, but it would add a new layer of federal conservation spending and program administration focused on migratory waterfowl nesting success, with eligible recipients including governments, nonprofits, and individuals.

Sentiment

The available materials suggest generally positive sentiment toward the bill, with a conservation-oriented and bipartisan presentation. There are no recorded votes or committee remarks showing opposition or support beyond introduction, so the record does not show active controversy. The bill’s emphasis on practical habitat tools, private landowner participation, and modest grant funding indicates a favorable framing among its sponsors.

Contention

No formal contention is documented in the provided record, but likely areas of debate include whether federal dollars should be directed to species-specific habitat projects, whether the prairie pothole region and California should receive targeted funding, and whether incentives for private landowners are the most effective approach. Critics might also question the reliance on hen houses and other management interventions versus broader wetland restoration, while supporters would likely emphasize cost-effectiveness and measurable gains in nesting success.

Companion Bills

US SB2315

Same As Habitat Enhancement Now Act

Previously Filed As

US SB2315

Habitat Enhancement Now Act

US HB1420

Pacific Flyway Habitat Enhancement Act

US AB2045

An act to amend Sections 1652, 1653, 1654, 1655, 1656, and 1657 of the Fish and Game Code, relating to fish and wildlife.

US HB1553

Relating To Habitat Conservation Plans.

US HB8438

Wildlife Corridors and Habitat Connectivity Conservation Act of 2026

US HB3276

Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act of 2025

US SB2281

Habitat stamps; require for hunters, fishers and trappers 16 years of age or older.

US SB2128

MONARCH Act of 2025 Monarch Action, Recovery, and Conservation of Habitat Act of 2025

US HB4062

MONARCH Act of 2025 Monarch Action, Recovery, and Conservation of Habitat Act of 2025

US HB2235

Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025

Similar Bills

IA HF2374

A bill for an act relating to Iowa's delta waterfowl special registration plates, providing fees, and making appropriations.

OK HB3659

Game and fish; waterfowl; nonresidents; public land; fines; effective date.

OK HB1383

Game and fish; waterfowl; nonresidents; public land; effective date.

OK HB1383

Game and fish; waterfowl; nonresidents; public land; effective date.

UT HB0093

Goshen Bay Waterfowl Management Area

UT HB0244

Wildlife Management Area Amendments

ND SB2216

Waterfowl habitat restoration stamp fees and the waterfowl habitat improvement fund.

ND SB2216

AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 20.1-02 and a new section to chapter 20.1-03 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to waterfowl habitat restoration stamp fees and the waterfowl habitat improvement fund.