HB4115, the “Saving Our MALLS Act,” would amend the Internal Revenue Code to exclude certain discharged debts secured by real property from taxable income. The bill creates a new category of excluded income for “qualified commercial or retail indebtedness,” generally covering debt incurred or assumed before March 1, 2023, discharged between December 31, 2023, and January 1, 2028, and secured by specified real property used in the taxpayer’s trade or business.
The measure is aimed at commercial and retail properties, including mall-related real estate, and is designed to provide tax relief when lenders forgive qualifying debt. It also coordinates this new exclusion with existing cancellation-of-debt rules and requires corresponding reductions in tax attributes, similar to other insolvency or real-property debt exclusions already in the tax code. The amendments would apply retroactively to discharges occurring on or after December 31, 2023.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would modify section 108 of the Internal Revenue Code by adding a new exclusion from gross income for certain forgiven commercial or retail real-estate debt and by updating related coordination and tax-attribute reduction provisions. This would affect taxpayers with qualifying business real property debt, particularly owners and operators of retail centers, malls, and similar commercial properties, by reducing or eliminating federal income tax liability on eligible debt forgiveness. The bill would also create a new statutory definition of qualifying indebtedness and specified real property, while leaving existing debt-cancellation exclusions in place.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record is available, so there is no recorded floor or committee debate to gauge broader sentiment. The bill’s introduction by bipartisan sponsors suggests some cross-party interest in providing targeted relief to commercial retail property owners. Overall, the bill appears framed as a pro-business, pro-retail stabilization measure rather than a controversial tax expansion.
Contention
The main policy question is whether forgiving commercial and retail real-estate debt should receive special tax treatment, and if so, how broadly that relief should extend. Potential points of contention include the retroactive effective date, the time-limited eligibility window, and whether the bill favors mall and retail property owners over other distressed borrowers. Critics could also question the revenue cost of excluding forgiven debt from income, while supporters are likely to emphasize preventing tax burdens from worsening commercial real-estate distress.
Protecting Life in Health Savings Accounts ActThis bill excludes expenses paid for an abortion from qualified medical expenses eligible for reimbursement from certain tax-exempt savings accounts. (Some exceptions apply.)Under the bill, amounts paid for an abortion, other than an excluded abortion, are not qualified medical expenses eligible for reimbursement from a health savings account, Archer medical savings account, health flexible spending arrangement, health reimbursement arrangement, or retiree health account.The bill defines excluded abortion as any abortion (1) related to a pregnancy that is the result of rape or incest; or (2) performed because a woman is suffering from a physical disorder, injury, or illness (including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself) that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death if an abortion were not performed.