HB3545, the TEENS Act, would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to loosen federal child labor hour restrictions for 14- and 15-year-olds and other employees ages 14 to 16. Under the bill, during any week in which school is in session, covered minors could work up to 24 hours, so long as work begins no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and ends no later than 9:00 p.m. The bill is framed as an effort to expand work opportunities and “everyday necessary skills” for teenagers.
The measure would change the federal definition of when youth employment is considered “oppressive child labor” by carving out an exception for these hours and time limits. In practical terms, it would give employers more flexibility to schedule school-age workers during the school year, while preserving a cap on total weekly hours and limiting late-night work. The bill was introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, with no recorded committee transcript or vote history provided.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would amend federal child labor standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act, narrowing the circumstances in which work by 14- to 16-year-olds during school weeks is treated as prohibited oppressive child labor. It would directly affect employers who hire minors, families of working teens, and enforcement of wage-and-hour rules by the Department of Labor, while preempting more restrictive treatment under federal law for the covered age group and hours.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the limited legislative record provided, the overall sentiment appears supportive among the sponsors, who present the measure as a skills-and-workforce opportunity for teenagers. No committee debate or votes are available, so there is no documented bipartisan or public opposition in the supplied materials. The bill’s framing suggests an emphasis on youth employment and practical experience rather than labor restriction.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely to be whether expanding school-year work hours for 14- to 16-year-olds protects opportunity or weakens child labor safeguards. Supporters, including the sponsors, appear to favor giving teens more flexibility to work and gain experience, while critics would likely argue that longer hours during the school year could interfere with education, rest, and child welfare. Because no committee transcript or vote record is provided, specific objections from lawmakers or stakeholders are not documented here.