Information and Communication Technology Strategy Act
Summary
HB2061, titled the Information and Communication Technology Strategy Act, would require the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, to produce a report on the economic competitiveness of the U.S. information and communication technology (ICT) supply chain. The report must identify ICT that is critical to U.S. economic competitiveness, assess the industrial capacity of U.S. and other “trusted” vendors that produce that technology, and evaluate the extent to which U.S. advanced telecommunications providers rely on ICT from “not trusted” companies.
Based on that report, the Secretary would then develop a whole-of-government strategy to strengthen trusted ICT vendors and reduce dependence on untrusted suppliers. The strategy must include recommendations on federal actions, needed resources, possible changes to federal programs or law, and assigned responsibilities across agencies. The bill also requires consultation with trusted ICT vendors and several federal officials, including the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and the FCC Chair.
Impact
The bill would not directly regulate private companies or impose immediate compliance obligations, but it would expand federal planning and coordination around ICT supply-chain security and competitiveness. It would direct the Commerce Department to assess supply-chain vulnerabilities, define federal roles, and recommend changes to federal programs, laws, or structures that may be needed to support trusted vendors and reduce reliance on untrusted technology sources. The bill also incorporates and relies on existing national-security-based concepts from the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019.
Sentiment
There is no recorded committee transcript or vote history in the provided material, so sentiment must be inferred from the bill’s sponsorship and structure. The bill appears to have bipartisan or cross-party appeal in principle, as it was introduced by Rep. Joyce and Rep. Lee, and it frames the issue as both an economic competitiveness and national security matter. Overall, the measure is presented in a policy-oriented, noncontroversial tone focused on study, coordination, and strategy development rather than immediate restrictions.
Contention
The main policy tension is likely to be between supporters of stronger federal action to bolster trusted domestic or allied ICT suppliers and those concerned about government intervention, market distortion, or the breadth of the “trusted” and “not trusted” framework. Another possible point of contention is the bill’s reliance on national-security determinations to define untrusted companies, which could affect foreign vendors and supply-chain relationships. Because the bill requires a whole-of-government strategy and possible changes to federal law or resources, debate may also arise over agency authority, implementation costs, and how aggressively the federal government should intervene in the ICT market.
Directs New Jersey Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Cell, Office of Information Technology, and New Jersey Big Data Alliance to develop advanced cyberinfrastructure strategic plan.
Relating to a prohibition on governmental contracts with companies of foreign adversaries for certain information and communications technology; authorizing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.
House Substitute for SB 51 by Committee on Legislative Modernization - Authorizing the chief information security officer to receive audit reports, updating statutes related to services provided by the chief information technology officer and authorizing the office of information technology services to provide certain services to political subdivisions and hospitals.