US Federal House Bill HB1781

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/25
• Refer: 3/3/25

Caption

To repeal certain executive orders.

Summary

HB1781 would nullify four executive orders issued on January 20, 2025: “Unleashing American Energy,” “Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements,” “Declaring a National Energy Emergency,” and “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.” The bill states that, beginning on enactment, those orders would have no force or effect and that no federal funds may be used to implement, administer, enforce, or carry them out. In practical terms, the bill is a congressional attempt to reverse or block major energy and environmental policy actions taken by the executive branch. It would affect federal agencies involved in energy development, environmental agreements, offshore leasing, and wind project permitting, while leaving intact any separate presidential authority not specifically impaired by the act.

Impact

If enacted, HB1781 would amend federal policy by stripping legal effect from the listed executive orders and prohibiting the use of federal funds to carry them out. That would directly affect agency implementation across energy, environmental, offshore leasing, and permitting programs, especially those tied to fossil fuel development, wind energy, and international environmental commitments. The bill does not create new regulatory standards; instead, it would remove the operative effect of the identified executive actions and constrain federal administrative activity related to them.

Sentiment

The available context shows the bill was introduced and referred to multiple committees, but there are no recorded committee transcripts or votes in the provided materials. Based on the bill text, the measure appears to reflect opposition to the cited executive orders and support for reversing the administration’s energy and environmental direction. Because no debate or vote history is included, there is no documented bipartisan or committee-level sentiment to assess beyond the bill’s clear policy purpose.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the scope and direction of federal energy and environmental policy. Supporters would view the bill as a check on executive overreach and a way to preserve offshore wind development and international environmental engagement, while opponents would likely see it as undermining the administration’s energy agenda and emergency response authority. The most disputed provisions are the repeal of the national energy emergency declaration and the offshore wind leasing withdrawal, since those directly affect energy production, renewable development, and federal land and ocean leasing decisions.