US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB1321

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/13/25  

Caption

Ending DOGE Conflicts Act

Summary

HB 1321, titled the "Ending DOGE Conflicts Act," would expand federal financial disclosure rules to a specific category of special Government employees: those who are owners, controlling shareholders, or chief executive officers of companies that contract with the federal government. The bill adds these individuals to the set of officials covered by subchapter I of chapter 131 of title 5, which governs public financial disclosure, and directs that their reports be reviewed and certified by the Director of the Office of Government Ethics. The bill also creates an interim restriction: until the required initial financial disclosure report is certified as compliant, the covered special Government employee may not perform official duties related to federal employment. In practical terms, the measure is aimed at preventing conflicts of interest by requiring transparency and temporarily barring covered individuals from acting in an official capacity before they have met the disclosure requirement.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would amend federal ethics and disclosure law by extending public financial reporting obligations to certain special Government employees connected to federal contractors. It would also give the Office of Government Ethics a direct role in reviewing and certifying those reports, and it would condition the ability of covered individuals to perform federal duties on compliance with the disclosure requirement. The measure would affect contractor-executives serving in special Government employee roles and could alter how agencies manage ethics screening and participation by such individuals.

Sentiment

The bill’s stated purpose and structure suggest a generally pro-ethics, anti-conflict-of-interest posture, with sponsors framing it as a transparency measure. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes in the provided material, there is no documented debate to indicate broader support or opposition. Based on the text alone, the bill appears designed to appeal to concerns about government integrity and contractor influence.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely to be the scope of the new disclosure and duty restrictions for special Government employees who also lead federal contractors. Supporters would likely argue that these individuals should be subject to the same or similar ethics scrutiny as other senior federal officials because of their access and potential conflicts. Opponents may argue that the bill could discourage private-sector experts from serving the government, impose burdensome compliance requirements, or create delays by preventing covered individuals from working until their reports are certified. No specific objections or amendments are provided in the available record.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

US HB7207

Presidential Conflicts of Interest Accountability Act

US HB1544

LEASH DOGE Act Legislative Enforcement Against Setbacks from Harmful DOGE Actions Act

US HB2601

Delete DOGE Act

US HB7052

Conflict Prevention Act

US HB1535

Bolstering America’s Democracy and Demanding Oversight and Government Ethics Act or the BAD DOGE ActThis bill provides that Executive Order 14158 (relating to establishing and implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency) shall have no force or effect.

US HB3733

Make DOGE Permanent Act

US HB2363

DOGE POUND Act of 2025 Data Of Government health Entities must be Protected from Overreach by Unelected Nonsecure Disruption Act of 2025

US HB620

General Assembly Conflicts of Interests Act; definition of "gift."

US HB6106

CLEAR Path Act Conflict-free Leaving Employment and Activity Restrictions Path Act

US HB1838

General Assembly Conflicts of Interests Act; definition of "gift."

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.